It's called a blunder.
does this have a name ?
Sort:
staggerlee wrote:
It's called a blunder.
Actually I'm in a very good position to win the game, wich is being trully weel disputed .. Latter on I'll post the complete game so you can comprove it !
the dumbass variation??? ... unless you have won with it i dont know... just doesn't seem like enough attacking power is gained by the sacrifice.
me 2 Ray_Brooks
Your opponent is not requred to play well after you blunder.
aabbccdd wrote:
me 2 Ray_Brooks
We live and learn, eh? I'm definitely gonna give it the odd run out at blitz.
I can't post the game right now because we haven't finished it yet .. But you will see how it allows me to take control of the game .. And my opponent is playing well and not making crushing mistakes nor something comparable to that ..
But like the site database show it tends to favor white xP
| White: | Fedorov Alexei (2600) | ||
| Black: | Adams Michael (2680) | ||
| Event: | Ch Europe (team) | ||
| Site: | Pula (Croatia) | ||
| Score: | 1-0 | Date: | 1997 |
| Opening: | King's Gambit: Accepted, Rosentreter-Testa Gambit (C37) | ||
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.d4 g4 5.Bxf4 gxf3 6.Qxf3 d6 7.Nc3 Nc6 8.Bc4 Qh4+ 9.Bg3 Qf6 10.Qxf6 Nxf6 11.O-O Nxd4 12.Rxf6 Be6 13.Bd3 Bg7 14.Rff1 Nc6 15.Nd5 O-O-O 16.c3 h5 17.Bh4 Rde8 18.Bc2 Be5 19.Rf2 Rhg8 20.g3 Rg4 21.Ne3 Rg7 22.Nf5 Rh7 23.a3 a6 24.Rd1 b5 25.Nd4 Na5 26.a4 c5 27.Nf3 Kc7 28.axb5 axb5 29.Bd3 Nc4 30.Ra1 Rb8 31.Ra7+ Rb7 32.Rxb7+ Kxb7 33.b3 Na5 34.Nxe5 dxe5 35.Bxb5 Nxb3 36.Bf6 c4 37.Bxe5 h4 38.Be8 h3 39.Rf4 Rh5 40.Bg7 Nc5 41.Bxf7 Rh7 42.Bd4 Rxf7 43.Bxc5 Kc6 44.Rxf7 Bxf7 45.Bd4 Bg6 46.e5 Kd5 47.Kf2 Ke4 48.e6 Kd5 49.e7 Ke6 50.Bc5 Kd5 51.Bb4 Ke4 52.Ba5 Bf7 53.Bc7 Kd3 54.g4 Kxc3 55.Ke3 Kb4 56.Kd4 Kb5 57.Ke5 Kc6 58.Kf6 Be8 59.Be5
There are plenty of other examples.
Interesting, but I'd be worried about heart failiour if I played that one too often. I'm scared of playing the initial KG as it is. 
It'll be interesting to see how you proceeded...
Reminds me slightly of the Halloween gambit, White gives up a whole Knight for a full pawn centre, and possibly a strong attack...
reminds me also of muzio. :)
It also reminds me of the Muzio Gambit in the King's Gambit. The Muzio goes like this and gives white a strong attack that's difficult to defend against.
http://www.chess.com/tournament/mad-gambit
First four brave souls.
p.s. Unrated, one day a move.... just for fun.
I guessed your question is answered but you might not want to try it that much.
On another chess site database (chessgames.com) the statistics are even better for white after 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.d4 g4 5.Bxf4 gxf3 6.Qxf3:
73.3% White wins
6.7% draw
20% black wins
But the sample is too small, only 15 games.
And I found no name for this opening, and no exclusive ECO code. It is classified as C37 - King Gambit Accepted.
It just seems that bringing a queen out so fast, without any other development or being able to catle, seems risky.
Here's a moving diagram of the game shown in post #11:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1014798
I'm not talking about the king's gambit .. I'm talking about what comes next to it when I give up my knight !