http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1079737
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1278856
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1076683
I'm no good at chess however, so I won't go into deeper analysis.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1079737
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1278856
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1076683
I'm no good at chess however, so I won't go into deeper analysis.
One of my teammates employs quite an unusual line against the Nf3 king's gambit. Namely, this:
When he first told me about it, I was rather skeptical, but looking briefly at some lines with Rybka convinced me that it is certainly sound. My instinct in the position would be to play d3 and continue developing. exf5 doesn't achieve anything and e5 leaves the e-pawn exposed to d6/Qe7 ideas.
I am not an expert in king's gambit, so maybe this line is not as rare as I think, but I am simply curious :)
So, my question is - do you have any experience with this line, any games to show, theoretical comments, etc?
I know that there are a lot of king's gambit enthusiasts on this site, so I am hoping for some input :)