19878 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
One of my teammates employs quite an unusual line against the Nf3 king's gambit. Namely, this:
When he first told me about it, I was rather skeptical, but looking briefly at some lines with Rybka convinced me that it is certainly sound. My instinct in the position would be to play d3 and continue developing. exf5 doesn't achieve anything and e5 leaves the e-pawn exposed to d6/Qe7 ideas.
I am not an expert in king's gambit, so maybe this line is not as rare as I think, but I am simply curious :)
So, my question is - do you have any experience with this line, any games to show, theoretical comments, etc?
I know that there are a lot of king's gambit enthusiasts on this site, so I am hoping for some input :)
I'm no good at chess however, so I won't go into deeper analysis.
This is the Gianutio Countergambit. I posted a game with this crazy line back in September: The King's Gambit: Obscure but Entertaining Lines , post #1.
It's rare, it's not bad (Black has many, too many good answers to the King's Gambit) but 2...Nc6 3.Nf3 f5 is an improved form of that idea.
But I agree with the OP that 4.d3 is the proper answer - actually for both of them.
i play chess like mikhail tal what are good openings for me?
by Reb a few minutes ago
My Refutation To The Fried Liver!
by KholmovDM 6 minutes ago
What's the most creative chess puzzle you've ever seen?
by SonOfThunder2 8 minutes ago
Another Capablanca's Chess Fundamentals midllegame blunder ?
by Vinedrinker 9 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by SonOfThunder2 10 minutes ago
by Wing-T 14 minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Neumann-Hernandez Dresden 1969
by herdwars 16 minutes ago
Discussion Forum About Tata Steel 2016
by Reb 17 minutes ago
stars in name
by AlexCampbell 19 minutes ago
by thegreat_patzer 21 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!