Fred Defense?

Sort:
Avatar of Davidmingming

I like this opening for Black because Black can regain back the pawn. (White doesn't want to protect the pawn with the g-pawn)

Avatar of Lord-Svenstikov
This is like the Old Benoni for e4 right?
Avatar of Lions
My Bob attack pwns ur Fred defense
Avatar of Graw81
3.Qh5+ There is not some trap im missing is there?! Surely not!
Avatar of Graw81
tbierig wrote: My Bob attack pwns ur Fred defense

 The Neil and Bob attack??? Surprised


Avatar of God2
Graw81 wrote: 3.Qh5+ There is not some trap im missing is there?! Surely not!

a agree with that!after that move u may be

1.cant castling

2.loss your castle

3.lose your development


Avatar of Lord-Svenstikov
Graw81 wrote: 3.Qh5+ There is not some trap im missing is there?! Surely not!

Good point. Well thats the end of the Fred Defence I suppose. :P


Avatar of Davidmingming
What about this way?
Avatar of Davidmingming
!!!???
Avatar of KillaBeez
Never play the Fred Defense.  Period
Avatar of Graw81
KillaBeez wrote: Never play the Fred Defense.  Period

 Agreed!


Avatar of chessfanforlife

...why play a unknowned defence?

choose:the king's indian,sicilian....just to name a couple.


Avatar of costelus
I think it's a very risky "defence". What about this line: 1 e4 f5 2. exf5 Nf6. 3. d4 d6 4. Bd3. White f5 pawn is now rock solid, Black is a pawn down with worse development (just look at the f8 bishop). White's pieces come up very easily, White can castle, I would definitely prefer this position as White.
Avatar of Davidmingming
KillaBeez wrote: Never play the Fred Defense.  Period

  I agree!


Avatar of grolich
Davidmingming wrote: What about this way?

In your 2...Nf6 diagram:

White can just maintain the pawn on f5 with Bd3 instead of Nf3, which is also an excellent developing move, and the f5 pawn cramps black's development a bit.  

 It's not easy at all for black to get this pawn back at all (Actually may not be possible.any move of the e or g pawn will cause an exchange which would leave white a pawn up. Also, black has worse king safety, and he doesn't even have better development. 

 

The short answer is: just say NO (to the fred) :) 


Avatar of Davidmingming
Yeah
Avatar of chessfanforlife
fred defence is a king's gambit for black....
Avatar of grolich
chessfanforlife wrote: fred defence is a king's gambit for black....

 Not really. It's not even the same structure reversed, because black's e pawn hasn't moved. If there is such a thing as the king's gambit for black is called the Latvian Gambit (1.e4 e5 (same pawn structure - minimum for you to be able to call it the same opening - but not e nough) 2.Nf3 f5!?!? (some would say ?!))


Avatar of chessman_calum
tbierig wrote: My Bob attack pwns ur Fred defense

lol!


Avatar of sstteevveenn
actually the latvian has much more in common with the king's gambit. 

Avatar of Guest9252481376
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.