How can I fight King's Gambit as Black

Sort:
kindaspongey

Possibly helpful:

Beating the open games, Mihail Marin

https://web.archive.org/web/20140626195205/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen102.pdf

Open-Games-Black-Igor-Lysyj

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627104938/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen159.pdf

Play the Open Games as Black by John Emms

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627022601/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen11.txt

Bologan's Black Weapons in the Open Games

http://www.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/Bologans-Black-Weapons-in-the-Open-Games-76p3873.htm

Starting Out: Open Games by GM Glenn Flear (2010)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140626232452/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen134.pdf

Play 1 e4 e5! by Nigel Davies (2006)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140626201436/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen80.pdf

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627083715/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen98.pdf

The Kaufman Repertoire for Black & White by Larry Kaufman (2012)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140626221508/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen162.pdf

Opening Repertoire: The Open Games with Black by Martin Lokander (2015)

https://www.newinchess.com/Shop/Images/Pdfs/7546.pdf

Playing 1.e4 e5 - A Classical Repertoire by Nikolaos Ntirlis (2016)

https://www.newinchess.com/Shop/Images/Pdfs/7572.pdf

schachfan1

From the theory books, I knew that (2.f4 ef 3.Nf3) 3. ... Be7 was called the Euwe defense. But however it is called, the line 4.Bc4 looks the least appealing for me (although this might be the main way). White has also 4.Nc3 and 4.d4 which I practice both, and there is 4.Be2. It's true that Black has to know at least one of the King's Gambit lines, while White has to be prepared for all of Black's main responses - in case of (2.f4 ef) 3.Nf3 - at least 3. ... g5, 3. ... d5, 3. ... d6, 3. ... Nf6. In blitz games I also rather often face 3. ... Nc6 and from time to time 3. ... h6 and 3. ... Ne7, but I like to explore opening variations. As for declibed King's gambit with 2.(f4) Bc5, the lines with (2.f4 Bc5 3.Nf3 d6) c2-c3 look attractive.

schachfan1

knig22 пишет:

 

Of course, 3.(ed) ef is better than the Falkbeer 3. ... e4. At last people are beginning to believe the engines concerning the correct evaluation of 2.f4 d5 3.ed e4?!

Rancid-Knight

I defend by not playing into e5 in the first place. Been playing the French defense for about a year now; no more KG problems. i.e. The lazy way out.

schachfan1

Gambit_Man пишет:

I defend by not playing into e5 in the first place. Been playing the French defense for about a year now; no more KG problems. i.e. The lazy way out.

I practiced the French defense for over 15 years - a good way to avoid the King's Gambit :)

Yigor
ReLentLess5150 wrote:

Your second example can lead to trouble as well: 4. bc4  nc6  5. nc3  exf4  6. d4  nxd4  7. ne5!?  bxd1?  8.  bxf7+!! ke7  9.nd5#  I believe it's call LaSalles Mate... or something like that.

 

Légal's mate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9gal_Trap

PsYcHo_ChEsS

The Falkbeer counter gambit is good for faster time control games especially. If white has not seen it much they can get into some trouble. The games get to this position a lot of times, which is fun to play as black has good attacking chances.

Now white has a hard time castling and must play accurately.

schachfan1

PsYcHo_ChEsS пишет:

The Falkbeer counter gambit is good for faster time control games especially. If white has not seen it much they can get into some trouble. The games get to this position a lot of times, which is fun to play as black has good attacking chances.

Now white has a hard time castling and must play accurately.

In case White wants to put up problems for Black in the Falkbeer, he plays 4.d3.

workhard91

1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 seems to be at least a really good practical choice. You don't need to know too much in most of the lines. I hope this was helpful for you.

allkindsofgains
If you don't want 3. ...g5 just play ...Be7 with the threat of Bh4+. White will not be able to castle and usually is less familiar with the theory behind the move. 3. ...Be7 is why I don't play the KG as white. I'm sure white has a way to play for equality but I personally hate the positions I get when people play that
schachfan1
allkindsofgains пишет:

If you don't want 3. ...g5 just play ...Be7 with the threat of Bh4+. White will not be able to castle and usually is less familiar with the theory behind the move. 3. ...Be7 is why I don't play the KG as white. I'm sure white has a way to play for equality but I personally hate the positions I get when people play that

The move Be7-h4+ might look as "threat", but it is not something to be afraid of, just like Qd8-h4+ after 2.f4 ef 3.Bc4

koko_le_gorille

it is really easy, don't play e5

schachfan1

intermediatedinoz пишет:

The problem with the Bishop on h4 is that it is not doing much other than forcing the White King to move to a safer place, all the while becoming a target for White, moreover with an inconvenient retreat.

+1 I experienced that in multiple practical and training games

Fat_Moose
You play BC5 on move 2, and if they take your pawn or push past it you play QH4 on move 3. After that it is hard to refute. If you don't mate them, you will at least have a great chance of pushing the king all around the board or grabbing the rook in the corner early.
Fat_Moose

I've seen an 1182 player do it. It does happen. 

schachfan1

That 1182 player might even not know that it was the King's Gambit. As a rule, after 2.f4 Bc5 - 3.Nf3 is played automatically. For some period I practiced 3.Qf3!? - with possible Qf3-g3

Fat_Moose

Are you suggesting that someone would play the KG at almost 1200 just on on a whim?? 

schachfan1

I simply suggest that everyone who plays regularly the King's gambit does not fall into a trap 2.f4 Bc5 3.fe or 3.f5

Fat_Moose
Naturally
Lilpix2

One interesting idea is to respond to the kings gambit with1.e4 e5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 exf4