How to read a oppening book

Hi people i play online chess,read books with annotated games,and study endgame but i have probleams reading oppening books.

So what is your problem?

Me too, they just seem so focused on the beginning. No Middle, No end.

its like i get distracted or easily tired when i read them but with game collections and endgame books its not like that

Use it as a reference work.

Maybe read the intro and first chapter, then start playing it in your games.
After each game played in a specific variation, go to your opening book and look up where you went wrong/read the section so you understand the plans/structure etc.

rinse. wash.repeat.

Try the opening books from the move by move series by Everyman chess. Well annotated games, with questions asked every now and then to keep you awake. 

just memorize every single move and you'll become a gm

No you won't 

I think assault  is right thank you

There are a variety of attitudes towards reading an opening book. In one of his books about an opening, GM Nigel Davies wrote (2005), "The way I suggest you study this book is to play through the main games once, relatively quickly, and then start playing the variation in actual games. Playing an opening in real games is of vital importance - without this kind of live practice it is impossible to get a 'feel' for the kind of game it leads to. There is time enough later for involvement with the details, after playing your games it is good to look up the line."

On the other hand, Hugh Patterson wrote (2015), "Because there are so many variations presented in these books [on various openings], many players try to skim through them. Don't do it. Play through every single example no matter how long it takes."

http://chessimprover.com/how-to-read-a-chess-book/

Sometimes, to percieve a writer's attitude, one can do a little reading between the lines. In 2014, GM David Smerdon wrote, "I recently took a train from Amsterdam to the quaint little Belgium town of Bruges. Looking for a book to keep me occupied for the four hour ride, I remembered ... Richard Pert’s Playing the Trompowsky ... And indeed, I was able to read the whole book, cover to cover, during the ride; ... It’s only 260 pages ... I decided to reread the book on the four hour return journey to Amsterdam." That is about 1.08 pages per minute.

http://www.chess.com/article/view/review-playing-the-trompowsky

How you read an opening book depends on your skill at chess.

And I suspect that, for many of us, difficulty with improvement comes, in part, from this sort of issue. We perhaps need a Kenny Rogers song about knowing when to read and when to skip.

I have had problems visualing the board positions at the end of variations when playing in my head, I am usually in transit quite often when I have time to study so a chess set is not an option. I thought one of the various mobile apps that have chess book reader combined with an onscreen board would be the best idea but find all it does is make me lazy so I don't really improve. Some authors have better ways of communicating what is important in the text than others so it may be better to follow a particular author that you like.

If you want to understand openings I suggest you put all your opening books in a box and put it in your cellar.

Start by studying endgames for a couple of years. How are you ever going to understand openings if you don't know where you want to be heading.

"Every now and then someone advances the idea that one may gain success in chess by using shortcuts. 'Chess is 99% tactics' - proclaims one expert, suggesting that strategic understanding is overrated; 'Improvement in chess is all about opening knowledge' - declares another. A third self-appointed authority asserts that a thorough knowledge of endings is the key to becoming a master; while his expert-friend is puzzled by the mere thought that a player can achieve anything at all without championing pawn structures.

To me, such statements seem futile. You can't hope to gain mastery of any subject by specializing in only parts of it. A complete player must master a complete game ..." - FM Amatzia Avni (2008)

Okido, but I said "start by".

"UNTIL YOU ARE MASTER STRENGTH YOU DON'T HAVE TO KNOW MORE THAN ABOUT TWO DOZEN EXACT ENDINGS." - GM Andrew Soltis (2009)