How to trap a queen in the Englund Gambit

Sort:
Avatar of KRISHNASAIPRANAV

Hi guys and you know how to capture your opponent’s queen very easily as Black? Thanks to the Rosen Trap.

 
Avatar of pcalugaru

Hope you like a lot of frustration and playing chess where you get punished in the later stages of the middle game (and crushed in the endgame!) Do not play this opening... thier is no value in learning it.

I'm NoT one to trash another's choice in an openings, believing that 90% of the openings and defenses are playable all the way up to the international level.

Yet ... the other 10% Are refuted/busted or they are solely based on tactical tricks and swindles...

In this case .. tricks and swindles. In the Englund Gambit, when your opponent doesn't fall for your tricks or swindle type tactics ... you as Black, are left with a bad position.... i.e. behind in development and down at least a pawn...

Avatar of KRISHNASAIPRANAV

At least it’s good if your opponent falls for it.

Avatar of KRISHNASAIPRANAV

And if you think that it’s bad, don’t blame me, blame IM Eric Rosen.

Avatar of pfren
KRISHNASAIPRANAV έγραψε:

And if you think that it’s bad, don’t blame me, blame IM Eric Rosen.

Yes, I can see that IM Eric Rosen has played this thing. Once, in a blitz game- and the result was predictable.

Avatar of pcalugaru
pfren wrote:
KRISHNASAIPRANAV έγραψε:

And if you think that it’s bad, don’t blame me, blame IM Eric Rosen.

Yes, I can see that IM Eric Rosen has played this thing. Once, in a blitz game- and the result was predictable.

Thank you... I wonder, will the pro commentators analyze this game, and understand by move 19 (late middle game) he was was fighting to get a 1/2 point.... (emphasis on fighting just to get a half point... in which he failed)

Avatar of pfren
pcalugaru έγραψε:
pfren wrote:
KRISHNASAIPRANAV έγραψε:

And if you think that it’s bad, don’t blame me, blame IM Eric Rosen.

Yes, I can see that IM Eric Rosen has played this thing. Once, in a blitz game- and the result was predictable.

Thank you... I wonder, will the pro commentators analyze this game, and understand by move 19 (late middle game) he was was fighting to get a 1/2 point.... (emphasis on fighting just to get a half point... in which he failed)

I dont think someone would bother analysing a blitz game played by two sub 2400 players.

Avatar of pcalugaru
 pfren wrote:
dont think someone would bother analysing a blitz game played by two sub 2400 players.

I don't think one has to analyze it all that deep. Just by a glance.... By move 17... Black... long term.... was in for a rough place. I'm Just not a fan of the Gambit... Granted, it's probably because at one point... I got tuned up by it pretty bad... causing me to burn some "midnight oil" on it's theory

My latest... foray ... A 5 min Blitz played by me over on Chessbase... Black resigned with 2 min still on his clock. (I have yet to have anyone play this OTB against me in a longer time control)

Avatar of Josh11live
Eric Rosen played it because he is an IM and he wanted fun but you, you are no IM.
Avatar of pfren
pcalugaru έγραψε:
 pfren wrote:
dont think someone would bother analysing a blitz game played by two sub 2400 players.

I don't think one has to analyze it all that deep. Just by a glance.... By move 17... Black... long term.... was in for a rough place. I'm Just not a fan of the Gambit... Granted, it's probably because at one point... I got tuned up by it pretty bad... causing me to burn some "midnight oil" on it's theory

My latest... foray ... A 5 min Blitz played by me over on Chessbase... Black resigned with 2 min still on his clock. (I have yet to have anyone play this OTB against me in a longer time control)

This is an Englund proper (assuming that "Englund" and "Proper" can live together in the same sentence).

Of course 4.Bf4/4.Bg5 is fine, but 4.Nc3! Nxe5 5.Bf4 is equally good, and extremely easy to play: White returns the pawn, gets a huge lead in development (with Qd2/d4, 0-0-0 and e2-e4), and that Queen is extremely clumsily placed at e7.

Avatar of SacrifycedStoat
I don’t know what the real name of the opening is, but it’s basically the ICBM for black
Avatar of KRISHNASAIPRANAV

Here is a game I used the Rosen Trap.

Avatar of KRISHNASAIPRANAV
Josh11live wrote:
Eric Rosen played it because he is an IM and he wanted fun but you, you are no IM.

It sometimes works, like in the game I showed you.

Avatar of KRISHNASAIPRANAV

Here is why my opponent resigned: After 28…Qf2+, his only move was 29. Kh2. But 29…Qxg2# is checkmate.

Avatar of KRISHNASAIPRANAV

However, there are exceptions.