I'm bringing Damiano Defense back!

Sort:
btl1230
I guess the white player's rate should be lower than 800
omaridepractice

This are for real?

 

ArgoNavis
Jajakilroy wrote:

 General-Mayhem yeah I get these urges to troll forums... ya you caught me. I was so surprized I won a game I was meaning to lose that I was like this could be great! If you look at some of my old post you can see some are clearly for comedy. I thought the Batman would be proud comment would have given it away. But I had my fun.

I like how you changed the first post so now it seems totally trollish...

kellypk417

CorporateShill wrote:

3 nxe5 is what you have to watch out for when playing the Damiano defense if black recaptures he loses his kingside rook and the pawn

Otherwise yes it's playable there's a game where Fischer drew somebody who played the Damiano defense against him. Obviously he was smart enough not to recapture. At that point you're still down and a particularly important because one

Exactly, if you play perfect you could draw! I lost one out of 50+ games over the years

ModestAndPolite
kellypk417 wrote:
CorporateShill wrote:

3 nxe5 is what you have to watch out for when playing the Damiano defense if black recaptures he loses his kingside rook and the pawn

Otherwise yes it's playable there's a game where Fischer drew somebody who played the Damiano defense against him. Obviously he was smart enough not to recapture. At that point you're still down and a particularly important because one

Exactly, if you play perfect you could draw! I lost one out of 50+ games over the years

 

I disagree. After 1. e4 e5, 2. Nf3 f6 3. Nxe5 Black is objectively lost.

eaguiraud

kingofshedinjas wrote:

Jajakilroy wrote:

 General-Mayhem yeah I get these urges to troll forums... ya you caught me. I was so surprized I won a game I was meaning to lose that I was like this could be great! If you look at some of my old post you can see some are clearly for comedy. I thought the Batman would be proud comment would have given it away. But I had my fun.

I like how you changed the first post so now it seems totally trollish...

Yes, he changed it, now people won't understand why we were trying to explain.

Jajakilroy

LOL yes denial must make you feel so good.

H_Staunton

I must say this thread has taken an interesting turn, and the character of Jajakilroy has been exposed in his last two posts. Yes he changed his first post, but he displays the same lack of understanding in post #49 as he did in post #1. Anyone who truly understand what Jakakilroy says in post #49 will realize that post #1 was not made in jest originally.