5.Bc5 is the AV-Traxler Gambit as I named it and 2.b5 is the Anti-Vienna/AV gambit
i Think i created a new gambit
Sort:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
adityasaxena4 wrote:
What's the name of this gambit ? If it's already there !
That's just mad losing for black, white almost gets 3 pawns and black has no compensation, not even an attack or a lead in development.
The compensation is that white's king is open and exposed and will never be able to castle .
This is kind of like a fusion of the Evans Gambit , the Danish/Goering Gambit and the Traxler Attack without a knight on f6
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
Which move is the gambit, don't give me move orders, give me one move.
Gambit #1 or Gambit #2
as in AV-Traxler Gambit (Gambit #2) or AV/Anti-Vienna Gambit (Gambit #1)
you can also win with it in 3 check chess!
adityasaxena4 wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
adityasaxena4 wrote:
What's the name of this gambit ? If it's already there !
That's just mad losing for black, white almost gets 3 pawns and black has no compensation, not even an attack or a lead in development.
The compensation is that white's king is open and exposed and will never be able to castle .
This is kind of like a fusion of the Evans Gambit , the Danish/Goering Gambit and the Traxler Attack without a knight on f6
There's even an element of the Portugese Gambit and the Blackburne-Kloosterbouer Gambit
If Bongcloud has been recently included as an opening, there are surely more potential new openings to be discovered. Though most of those would be unsound. 
adityasaxena4 wrote:
What's the name of this gambit ? If it's already there !
Not a gambit, Vienna game
My new gambit against 3.Nf6 in the Italian
2.b5 then 4.d5 then 5.Bc5 , 6.Bxf2+ 7.Qh4+ 8.Qxc4+ 9.Qxc6