Indian Advance?

Sort:
sndeww

I hate people who imply that the KID is anything like the modern defense.

1e4c6_O-1

@b1zmark I didnt say it was like the modern defense, I just said it was a more modern approach to the Indian

Anonymous_Dragon

Will anyone please care to help me out with my doubt ? Do we really have modern openings and hypermodern openings in chess separately ? I know there is one specific opening called the modern opening....but u get my question right ...

sndeww
MISTER_McCHESS wrote:

@b1zmark I didnt say it was like the modern defense, I just said it was a more modern approach to the Indian

define modern. as far as I know a modern doesn't exist.

sndeww
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

Will anyone please care to help me out with my doubt ? Do we really have modern openings and hypermodern openings in chess separately ? I know there is one specific opening called the modern opening....but u get my question right ...

yes confused here too

Anonymous_Dragon
B1ZMARK wrote:
MISTER_McCHESS wrote:

@b1zmark I didnt say it was like the modern defense, I just said it was a more modern approach to the Indian

define modern. as far as I know a modern doesn't exist.

yeah

rpkgs
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

Will anyone please care to help me out with my doubt ? Do we really have modern openings and hypermodern openings in chess separately ? I know there is one specific opening called the modern opening....but u get my question right ...

To be honest, the modern defense has been around for over a century, so I do not think it is really modern. 

Anonymous_Dragon

I had to google up stuff .... and @MISTER_McCHESS what r u smoking ? There's no hypermodern and modern as separate stuff. Thats what I could find till now.

sndeww
Mr_Winawer wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

Will anyone please care to help me out with my doubt ? Do we really have modern openings and hypermodern openings in chess separately ? I know there is one specific opening called the modern opening....but u get my question right ...

To be honest, the modern defense has been around for over a century, so I do not think it is really modern. 

question was what's the difference between modern and hypermodern.

1e4c6_O-1

ok i have made a different forum for this modernism vs hypermodernism debate https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/hypermodernism-debate

Anonymous_Dragon
Mr_Winawer wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

Will anyone please care to help me out with my doubt ? Do we really have modern openings and hypermodern openings in chess separately ? I know there is one specific opening called the modern opening....but u get my question right ...

To be honest, the modern defense has been around for over a century, so I do not think it is really modern. 

Yes I know that.... but my main concern is.... the way u have a distinct approach known as the classical approach...... do you really have another two distinct approaches called modern and hypermodern ? arent they the same thing ?

1e4c6_O-1
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Mr_Winawer wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:

Will anyone please care to help me out with my doubt ? Do we really have modern openings and hypermodern openings in chess separately ? I know there is one specific opening called the modern opening....but u get my question right ...

To be honest, the modern defense has been around for over a century, so I do not think it is really modern. 

Yes I know that.... but my main concern is.... the way u have a distinct approach known as the classical approach...... do you really have another two distinct approaches called modern and hypermodern ? arent they the same thing ?

go to the hypermondernism debate forum for this wink.png

Laskersnephew

I'm not sure there is any "idea" behind 2.d5. It just looks like a poor move. My impulse would be to challenge it immediately with somethin like 2...c6!