is the caro kann boring

Sort:
itay72

been playing the scandinavian for a while and i'm starting to get sick of it. i have started looking into the caro kann since it seems like more solid opening than the scandinavian. do you guys enjoy playing the caro kann? do you enjoy playing the positions that arise from it? 

MaetsNori
itay72 wrote:

been playing the scandinavian for a while and i'm starting to get sick of it. i have started looking into the caro kann since it seems like more solid opening than the scandinavian. do you guys enjoy playing the caro kann? do you enjoy playing the positions that arise from it? 

The Sicilian and the Caro-Kann are my two favorite responses to 1.e4. I've been playing the C-K for years.

I don't find the C-K boring at all. The positions are always imbalanced in some way.

MaetsNori
TheNameofNames wrote:

yes i think so except that it can transpose into the french, its a pretty boring opening no sharp lines like in the spanish with the bishops eyeing the king or anything its a slow opening

Black has aggressive lines to play, if he chooses.

Here's one that I particularly enjoy:

White better put on his boxing gloves - he's in for a fight.

mejurist
Caro-Kann is solid, and it all depends how you play it - the Short Variation can become very sharp after 5… c5, and there are tons of sidelines that can make for exciting games (e.g. the (in)famous Tal Variation - 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 Bf5 4.h4)
ninjaswat
IronSteam1 wrote:
TheNameofNames wrote:

yes i think so except that it can transpose into the french, its a pretty boring opening no sharp lines like in the spanish with the bishops eyeing the king or anything its a slow opening

Black has aggressive lines to play, if he chooses.

Here's one that I particularly enjoy:

White better put on his boxing gloves - he's in for a fight.

Huh, avoiding the c5-break for the h6-g5-f6 stuff... interesting.

Is it good enough to play otb though? I'm not sure, considering it invalidates the entire "main break" of the caro.

SenseiWu0513

i play the caro kann and i love it

MaetsNori
ninjaswat wrote:

Huh, avoiding the c5-break for the h6-g5-f6 stuff... interesting.

Is it good enough to play otb though? I'm not sure, considering it invalidates the entire "main break" of the caro.

It's less common than the c5 break, for sure. Though, I'd say it's still playable.

Here, Shankland played that general setup against Nakamura - keeping his pawns sturdy on the queenside and playing on the kingside instead. (Hikaru's bishop forced Sam to play ...f5 instead of ...f6, though it's the same general idea).

I'd say if it can survive a test from Hikaru's white pieces, it's probably a viable approach. thumbup

Ethan_Brollier

In my opinion, not at all. I really like the Caro-Kann as White, as you have just... so many options, and all of them are good. If you like interesting, unusual positions, there's the Advanced Panov Attack (Toikkanen Gambit specifically is very interesting), and if you can always transpose to the Panov Attack. If you like IQP positions, there's the Panov Attack. If you like interesting, unintuitive play, there's the Breyer Variation (shown below)


If you like your bishops better than your knights, there's the Advance Variation, (if you like safe, simple, and solid traps, there's the Advance, Tal Variation). If you like pawn centers, there's the Fantasy Variation. If you want to avoid a c-file pawn break and don't mind your opponents being able to develop their knight well, there's the Exchange Variation. If your theory is up to scratch, you could always try the Mainline, as Black's options to vary the position before the game reaches the Mainline (Gurgenidze System, Campomanes Attack, Gurgenidze Counterattack) aren't very good, and White seems to have a solid advantage in the Mainline.