is the Sicilian Sveshnikov considered aggressive?
It's considered sharp, which can translate to aggressive to some. It's also unforgiving if you play badly.
It's considered sharp, which can translate to aggressive to some. It's also unforgiving if you play badly.
A player can play any opening he likes. The Sveshnikov is a fine choice if it suits your play. But I wouldn't worry about learning reams of theory at your rating - just the general concepts. It's slightly strategically risky due to the d5 hole and potentially the d6-pawn. A break with ...f5 (with suitable development) is a motif, as are ...Bg5 trying to stop Ne3-d5 and the standard Sicilian ...b5-b4 ideas. Your nightmare endgame is a White Knight on d5 against Black's dark-squared Bishop - you must not allow him to get this or else you will suffer a slow and very painful death.
The Sveshnikov is not aggressive and the most difficult to play among sicilians. Black either accepts weakness on d5 or doubled pawns on f7 and f6. I have played it on both sides and I lost as black more.
How do you define "aggressive"? If you mean dropping material and that turning into a deep sacrifice in the long run, then...no, it isn't.
It is a fine, very sound opening, which needs a great deal of memorization and superb positional understanding: Playing against your "Bolseslavsky hole" at d5 without a well planned counterplay will (almost) never work. A recent example is the game Caruana- Kamsky from the US championship. Kamsky, who is an excellent strategist, picked the Sveshnikov/ Novosibirsk without a proper opening preparation, played a couple of sub-par moves, and was wiped without being able to put any real resistance, other than a quasi-attack which was doomed before it started.