King "s gamit and evan"s gambit

Sort:
Avatar of pawnmaters

What will be the endgames of this two openings is the king's gambit is anvantage or the evan"s gambit?

Avatar of AnastasiaStyles
Pen2da_Pixel wrote:

At your sub-novice level, might I suggest that you kindly forget about openings and just learn more basic things like not how to lose your queen in the first 3 moves and such.

Wheareas you, at your lofty level of 1321, get to ask about openings in all your threads so far?

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/learning-new-openings-as-a-beginner
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/quick-question-about-quoton-linequot-opening-databases

Anyway, as to the original question, I'd suggest that very few people play King's Gambit with the endgame in mind; it's about opening things up quickly and aggressively, and ending the game before it reaches an endgame. At least, that's my view of it, at my modest level.

Avatar of pawnmaters

i challenge you pen2da_pexel.. can you? protect your word!

Avatar of moonnie

The endgame is rarely dependend on the first 4-5 moves of a game. There are for example many ways in the kingsgambit to either accept or deny the pawn.

 

My personal opinion is that evans gambit is positionaly a little more sound than kingsgambit so all other things equal (something that will never happen in practice) the endgame arising from evans should be slightly better thant those from kingsgambit

Avatar of pawnmaters

ok.. so just zipp your mouth from useless word.. ok?

Avatar of NimzoRoy
asidfreak wrote:

What will be the endgames of this two openings is the king's gambit is anvantage or the evan"s gambit?

They're both genuine gambits in which White is giving up a pawn for a lead in development and hopefully an attack as well. I don't think anyone can draw any hard and fast conclusions about the endgames arising from these openings.

Offhand this seems like an irrelevant topic for you, you can try playing these openings as White if you want to although I'd recommend the Italian or Four Kts Game instead of a risky gambit for now. You should be concentrating on learning basic principles of openings and endgames for now IMHO. Worrying about what sort of endgame arises out of these openings is kinda like trying to study calculus before you've learned geometry and algebra first. 

http://www.chess.com/blog/NimzoRoy/endgame-faqs?_domain=old_blog_host&_parent=old_frontend_blog_view

http://www.chess.com/blog/NimzoRoy/chess-opening-principles?_domain=old_blog_host&_parent=old_frontend_blog_view