16676 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Check out this ChessBase article (published on the day after April Fools' Day): http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8047
Apparently after 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4, the only move that doesn't lose by force is 3. Be2, which draws.
Bullshit. Vasik should be high on something evil when he posted this crap.
First I was like
"On March 31 the author of the Rybka program, Vasik Rajlich, and his family moved from Warsaw, Poland to a new appartment in Budapest, Hungary. The next day, in spite of the bustle of moving boxes and setting up phone and Internet connections Vas, kindly agreed to the following interview, which had been planned some months ago."
It seems outlandish to say ...Nf6 refutes the 3.Bc4 line cause after e5 black has to waste a time getting his knight to safety and I highly doubt the opening is solved since a universal fact is engines aren't as good at positonal understanding as humans are.
Huh? 1.e4 e5 2.f4 ef4 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.e5?! is known to be bad for white due to 4...d5 (although Black should be slightly better with other moves as well).
I don't understand how that opening can be solved? How can it ever be verified?
It's April Fools. Chessbase does a joke like this every April Fools.
But it's April 2nd...
Surely you can't be that naive. Read the article and the variation board diagram. Of course it's a joke!
The joke is it was posted on the first. April fools boy.
Actually, no it was not, so it's not exactly within the boundaries of the Official International April's Fool Day Regulations. The article was published in 2nd April, but mentions that the interview took place the day after 31 March.
Here's the same discussion: http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/im-rajlich-claims-kings-gambit-is-solved-by-rybka-cluster
If true, I am shocked.
But it is irrelevant to practical chess, especially blitz. All gambits do well here in the hands of a knowledgeable player.
They would have pulled it from their Chess Base site if it were an April fools day joke.
How do you know?
Funny to note how different the two threads are! One is full of people 100% positive it's an April Fools joke while the other thread believes it.
So I was right. Pago pago time.
I knew it was a joke the moment I read the article. It amazes me at how gullible people like arctor can be to actually fall for a story like that. It was so ridiculous as to have me laughing, especially at the variation board they posted. Come on, people...
by DannyPower 2 minutes ago
Don't english me!
by kaynight 4 minutes ago
Does most of the world really love the stalemate factor?
by evertVB 4 minutes ago
What do you say when people ask how good at chess you are ?
by Smokering26 5 minutes ago
Please check my game
by notmtwain 6 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by Caedrel 7 minutes ago
When is the Carlsen vs Nakamura blitz final?
by notmtwain 7 minutes ago
Advice for my Chess Tournament
by ChessOfPlayer 8 minutes ago
History of obtaining points
by batgirl 9 minutes ago
8/27/2016 - Alexander Hildebrand, Springaren, 1951
by Laki_97 11 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!