My gambit!

Sort:
Avatar of lolurspammed

It's amazing how people don't realize that chess is a concrete game and objectivity does exist. Playing G4/G5 in the opening is rarely helping your development especially with material loss. I'm sure 1.e4 b5 is a fantastic gambit too!

Avatar of Sauron808

Basically a black version of this https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/the-gibbins-weidenhagen-gambit

Avatar of congrandolor
Strangemover escribió:

I shall counter your gambit sir!

Nice refutation

Avatar of pfren
Bongoman2406 wrote:
RybkaShredder wrote:
 

I won't waste time taking pawns. I want to get my pieces out, castle queenside, and realize a kingside attack centering on the semi-open g-file

The only way to make this work is white thinking "I am playing an idiot" and move whatever nonsense there is.

Avatar of overrated1200

 

Avatar of numismaticsandchess

I win with this opening, and I am 2120 USCF rated. 

Avatar of Laskersnephew

Well. I wouldn't touch that gambit with a ten foot pole, but if it makes you happy, play it and good luck!

Avatar of numismaticsandchess

To begin with, the line goes 1 Nf3 g5 2 Nxg5 e5

Avatar of congrandolor
Diakonia wrote:
Bongoman2406 wrote:
jengaias wrote:

Nice way to lose a pawn on move 2 without any compensation.

Very creative and ingenious.

The compensation is the open g-file in the long term, and a space advantage immediately with 3...d5

1. Its a "semi-open" file, not open file.

2. Neither you nor your opponent are controlling that semi-open file, and who decided that you were going to, and not your opponent?

3. What "space" advantage do you have?  Neither of you have moved a central pawn.  

4. What decided your central pawn move is better that whites?

You gave a pawn away with no compensation.  

Actually, white moved twice the knight to grab the pawn, I guess that is the compensation

Avatar of pfren
congrandolor έγραψε:

Actually, white moved twice the knight to grab the pawn, I guess that is the compensation

 

The compensation is that there is no compensation.

It is similar to the ever-infamous Gibbins-Weidenhagen gambit (1.d4 Nf6 2.g4?), but a whole tempo down.

Avatar of kindaspongey

Has Bongoman2406 been here since 2016?

Avatar of pfren
kindaspongey έγραψε:

Has Bongoman2406 been here since 2016?

 

Yes.

Avatar of llamonade2

I've actually faced the gibbins thing in blitz, but the OP's followup of Bh6 unnecessarily adds a layer of stupid.

(I realize this is years old and he's many 100s of points higher rated now.)

Avatar of You_play_well

Awww baby, you lay some of that sweet gambit lovin' on us. We dig it.

Avatar of numismaticsandchess

Herrstrom Gambit is playable. You go 1 Nf3 g5 2 Nxg5 e5 3 Nf3 Nc6  with an upcoming ...h6 - ...Rg8 - Nf6. 

Avatar of adityasaxena4

 

What do you think ?