The only other possibility I saw was in a footnote after 6 ... N-K2 7 Q-N4 PxP 8 QxNP R-N1 9 QxP Q-B2 10 K-Q1 QN-B3 11 N-B3 PxP 12 N-N5 R-B1 (a) when Footnote (a) (A) gives "Better is 12 ... NxP, answered by", then of two possibilities, the only one for White that ended in a slight advantage for Black was 13 B-B4 Q-N3 14 BxN RxN 15 P-KR4 R-KN1 16 K-K1 B-Q2 17 R-R3 R-N5 -+ (was given as - over + which I can't replicate), Matulovic-Uhlman, Budapest 1967.
Does that line look familiar? Otherwise, I would need more clues to go on.
Unfortunately i lost all my score sheets from when i played in the Bristol league in the mid-late 1980s and i can't remember how a particular line in the French Def. Poisoned Pawn went.
The first occasion i played it was against a very strong player (Board 2 for the 1st team) in our club's knockout tournament and i had the White pieces. I knew he played the French Defence so i looked through my copy of MCO - 11th edition (which i no longer have) for some ideas in preparation for the game. I noticed a wild looking line for White that ended in (i think) an evaluation of "clear advantage to Black" but it wasn't clear to me why so i played through some possible continuations and decided that the evaluation depended on Black finding quite a subtle King move a little later on which ended White's attack, otherwise he would be dead lost. I thought it was worth a gamble and in the game my opponent didn't find the saving King move and so lost in 29 moves.
Are there any French Defence experts who can recognize the variation in question? It may possibly be an offshoot from the 10. Kd1 variation but i can't remember for sure
. Also, if someone has a copy of MCO 11 (and maybe other editions too) they could perhaps retrieve the variation from my description?
I played it once more a year later, also in the club KO tournament and won in 21 moves against a lower rated opponent who had previously kept beating me with his blasted French Def. so i was looking for revenge!