Forums

Parham Conspriacy Theory

Sort:
Ben_Dubuque

no I think they should send the dued to whatever execution meathod he chooses. but dued I don't think threats are a crime. though Nimzoswich said the threat is more poerful than the execution. anyway. you do realize that I don't care anymore and you in a way just helped me. I don't have any preasure inside I feel like a free man now. like all this tension inside of me evaporated on that post. I guess it is the one thing I can thank you for. but you need to lighten up and quit calling people racist when you interpret their comments that way. you also have to adimt that you are wrong sometimes and that if you don't admit it you will be the idiot.

 I adimited I was wrong in threatening to shoot you I forgave you all the insults you threw at me and all you do in return is throw more at me. I wasted all my anger on that one post. Kind of glad the mods deleted some of it.

The_Gavinator

See I try to be helpful, I guess chess.com doens't like me helping others with the Parham, especially since the staff give out bans if you are a fan of the Parham, it's sad...

Ben_Dubuque

Gavinator I can't believe you still believe that crap. they just don't like people who the  rest of us call abusive. and if you look at all of my posts I am generaly not mean, but nice. respectful and actually listen to advice. its only when people piss me off that you get the random post calling you out me.

Sam998
The_Gavinator wrote:

Yes, but if there is causation, then there will be correlation. How much correlation do you need? Can you think of a better way of explaining this, only Parham does.

That sentence doesn't even make sense. '

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/causation?s=t

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/correlation?s=t

Try again.

The_Gavinator

You just went off on me, and you didn't get banned, whatupyodog didn't and he got banned.

Sam998

Sungloian and Gavinator vs Joeydvivre?

kco
Sungolian wrote:
ChristianSoldier007 wrote:

I still feel like this would be way more interesting with some sort of climatic showdown. I'm sure if a match was orchestrated between parham advocates and opposing advocates it would get a lot of attention. And with my experience doing stuff like that, it would be interesting.

And to gavi, I mean it as a live thing not online so you cant accuse anyone of cheating

I'm down for a team match. Although Gavin and I are the only two left on our "team" since our other allies have been banned.

"two" ? there 10 memnbers in that group.

The_Gavinator

Are you stupid? Let's make this nice and easy. There is causation between what time my alarm is set for, and when I get up. So if you made a scatterplot, with the x's as the alarm time, and the y's as when I get up, there would be nearly perfect correlation.

Jetfighter, look at the OP, you just went crazy on me, and you're not banned. What you said was much worse than whatupyodog, and he wasn't even warned.

Ben_Dubuque

no first we tryed to convince you using logic, you all called us dumb. we then countered by posting lines. some good some bad. the good lines proved the parham to give black equal chances in the game. you still ignored us and ganged up on christian soldier and I because we kept posting flawed lines and called us dumb. after many times of the cycle repeting and then you calling me a racist. and a few people telling me not to bother with you guy's . calling me a racist broke the last straw and I blew up. My actions were fairly logical I was provoked and yet you call me abusive and choose to ignore your own insults. I really feel that you need to pay more attention of get out of the public school because whatever the delinquents are smoking in the back of the room is aweful strong. and you are obviously getting it in your system.

The_Gavinator

Jetfighter- What were the good lines, there were none, that's the whole freakin point

Ben_Dubuque

cuz you friggin ignored them.

The_Gavinator

What are the lines, there aren't any posted...

kco
The_Gavinator wrote:

Jetfighter- What were the good lines, there were none, that's the whole freakin point

uh oh here we go again....

Ben_Dubuque

we have one already.

The_Gavinator

Somebody is going to engine, and it doesn't matter. You all have an IM too, we don't

DrSpudnik

Typical conspiracy/coverup: by the time you figure out who's who, the story changes and anyone still paying attention just thinks you're a nut.

Ben_Dubuque

I am completely honest I don't use engines because I think that to learn chess one has to do it organically the only automated help I get is from the lovely thing that chess dot com calls Tactics trainer. and it really works.

The_Gavinator

Your anti-Parham, it's not fair. And can we group chat in skype?

The_Gavinator

We have to work it out. I don't think 1v1 proves anything, there's still no way to stop enigning.

The_Gavinator

Even on that, you guys are really dedicated to anti-parham, you will engine...

This forum topic has been locked