None. Because I know the answer to all of them. Hence why I'm a QGA player in the first place.
e2-e4 fails to impress because after e4 to e5, my knight just jumps to d5 - anti-Alapin style.
e6 is outright stupid - blocking your bishop. Let alone that it's not challenging.
Nf3... so I won't be able to play e5... I go and do other things, my normal move is e3 anyway, and not e4.
QGA is a choice of Anand, and it's practical. Highly underrated.
You want to know what would intimidate me: f3. - the Sämisch ('Zeimish'. King's Indian Defence, Sämisch Variation) pawn-structure:
After 2...dxc4, White's e4 and d4 pawns aren't scary - they're hanging, unless if f3 is played, That's serious - a g2-f3-e4-d4 pawn chain. But, since not One persons ever plays it, and since I don't think there is yet such theory, and people are cubes - doing only theory, especially d4 players - which are the more careful ones, I win with QGA.
f3-power in a d4 opening:
3:55
 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    
QGA Players which of withes third Moves do you consider most challenging and why
3. e3
3. Nf3
3. e4