TheRealThreat wrote:
Fisher is right!!! The is a joke! sac a knight for a pawn just to have two pawns in the center. You're not leading in development, so the sac doen't make sense. Beside, The only advantages is you have two pawn in the center...
Why did you name this crazy gamit Chicago Gamit? heheheh
PLEASE change the name. I live in Chicago and I don't want anyone to think that Chi-town chess players plays such opening.
I have an idea. rename it Michigan Gambit
No. I have an idea. Rename it Serbia Gambit
You have to make perfectly exact moves in order to keep the advantage with this gambit.
Against a 1600-2200 rated player this gambit would work very well.
It's easy to say it's losing, but try playing it without the computer.