here's how to refute the fried liver
That is not a refutation - it leads to checkmate
here's how to refute the fried liver
That is not a refutation - it leads to checkmate
Usually, I play the Petrov Defense and end up in this position:
I always play the same and I get the feeling that my opponent didn't really want to play the Two Knights Defense and didn't know how to handle it. However I do not think Black's position is hopeless being a piece up. Hang on to the piece, head for c7 with your King and be prepared to give back the material at the right moment. The jury is still out after more than 400 years.
here's how to refute the fried liver
That is not a refutation - it leads to checkmate
bruh its a joke
This is moment when some play Bxf2+ and go on to lose.
The whole Traxler thing is about 5...Ke7, not the awful 5...Kf8.
f8 is needed by the h8 rook.
This is moment when some play Bxf2+ and go on to lose.
The whole Traxler thing is about 5...Ke7, not the awful 5...Kf8.
f8 is needed by the h8 rook.
So, would the best move be the knight to the rim?
here's how to refute the fried liver
this gets you mated in 3 moves
nope not true
This is moment when some play Bxf2+ and go on to lose.
The whole Traxler thing is about 5...Ke7, not the awful 5...Kf8.
f8 is needed by the h8 rook.
So, would the best move be the knight to the rim?
If you mean 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5, then yes.
Actually it's the only good move for Black.
I've never actually played it, and it seems I shouldn't