The Voidstrike Gambit (A New Gambit That I Tried Creating!!)

Sort:
Avatar of Tec
Ein-Schachspieler wrote:
TintasKingTR hat geschrieben:
Ein-Schachspieler wrote:

No, I don’t like it. Sacrificing a knight like this doesn’t create enough compensations and complications.

bro, this is a very very complex idea. what are you talking about? by the way you may not like it thats your opinion

I am not convinced by this. I might not have the full strength to understand it, but in my opinion, there are some strange moves involved.

Ofc Black has to do some little mistakes, but all of them look like natural moves. Also the line is so unique, nobody would know a refutation. But actually I'd really like to see an actual game with it

Avatar of satrancustasi29

the gambit is hard to memorize but it looks really good

Avatar of khushalkothari01

Crazy cool gambit!! really complex and interesting, underrated for sure.

Avatar of TintasKingTR

i think the old pgn for this gambit was too complex so here is an updated pgn with comments for moves:

thanks for commenting btw

Avatar of adityasaxena4
TintasKingTR wrote:

The Voidstrike Gambit!

Firstly, This Gambit Is Kind Of Rare. But In My Opinion, It Is Overpowered When Used!

Also This Gambit Can Be Used At Any Level Since It Puts Alot Of Pressure On Your Opponent And It Is Not Too Risky!

Full PGN:
 
(Couldnt Put All Of Them Here)
I Would Really Want To Hear What You Guys Think About The Gambit.
Thanks For Checking Out The Gambit!
 

 
 
 

Black could easily escape danger after taking the knight with Be7 and O-O. This just becomes an inferior version of a same side kingside attack with white being down a piece and virtually no targets or compensation opportunities at all.

Avatar of ChessNoobAdam1
Ein-Schachspieler rašė:
TintasKingTR hat geschrieben:
Ein-Schachspieler wrote:

No, I don’t like it. Sacrificing a knight like this doesn’t create enough compensations and complications.

bro, this is a very very complex idea. what are you talking about? by the way you may not like it thats your opinion

I am not convinced by this. I might not have the full strength to understand it, but in my opinion, there are some strange moves involved.

Me too. If you look at it, the opponent made some impossibly stupid mistakes. Even Martin bot (250 elo) would not do those.

Avatar of tylaiio

One of the worst openings i have seen

Avatar of TintasKingTR
Btw why u low elo guys commenting bad stuff on my gambit while all of high elos atleast show some respect lol. Also you cant escape with Be7 that loses immediately if you check the analysis and the continuations . atleast learn some more chess and get more elo to fully understand this gambit
Avatar of adityasaxena4
TintasKingTR wrote:
Btw why u low elo guys commenting bad stuff on my gambit while all of high elos atleast show some respect lol. Also you cant escape with Be7 that loses immediately if you check the analysis and the continuations . atleast learn some more chess and get more elo to fully understand this gambit

What does Be7 lose immediately to? You've got no attacks or tactics after Be7. It's Ne7 you wrote continuations for not Be7.

Avatar of TintasKingTR
adityasaxena4 wrote:
TintasKingTR wrote:
Btw why u low elo guys commenting bad stuff on my gambit while all of high elos atleast show some respect lol. Also you cant escape with Be7 that loses immediately if you check the analysis and the continuations . atleast learn some more chess and get more elo to fully understand this gambit

What does Be7 lose immediately to? You've got no attacks or tactics after Be7. It's Ne7 you wrote continuations for not Be7.

check analysis if u dont understand

Avatar of adityasaxena4

If Be7 Nd5 Qd8 Be3 then black could play Bd6 to guard c7 and then Bb6 Qg5 and there is no Nc7

Avatar of TintasKingTR
Bruh check analysis before writing plss dont say nonsense