Keeping Track Of Openings:

Sorry for sumbitting so many.. you can only use 2/3
its fine, most of them are small subdivisions of a line...

Why did neither of mine not advance? They were perfectly fine openings!
what do you mean
Sorry for sumbitting so many.. you can only use 2/3
its fine, most of them are small subdivisions of a line...
Why did neither of mine not advance? They were perfectly fine openings!
what do you mean
So, I made a forum to make the best openings. I'm keeping track of all of them down here.
The competition has concluded: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/3-years-later-the-competition-is-over
In a while, I will grade each opening on aesthetics, and feasibility, from 1-10.
If I got your opening wrong, or missed it, I will update it.
If you feel I have graded you wrongly I will explain my reasons for grading that way and work out a deal.
Thanks to all who participated!
Those whose openings are not bolded survive to the next round!
Round 1: Complete! (This round was a quick round, with me taking glances at every opening. If it was unfit, it was bolded) All of the openings that made it past this round are at least below-average.
Round 2: Finished: Openings will be evaluated seriously, taking small faults as a weakness. Barely any openings will be bolded, except the non-serious openings which don't make much sense. All of the openings that make it past this are regular openings.
Round 3: In Progress: A serious evaluation based on aesthetics and feasibility. The top 20 openings will survive. Any openings that make it past this round are deemed serious, and good.
Round 4: Done! shortening the competition, except this round will not be judged by only me. They will also be judged by a non-biased impartial judge who has not submitted an entr
THIS IS THE FINAL COUNTDOWN!
Round 5: Not Started: Choosing the final 5, the traits mentioned above are EXTREMELY important.
Round 6: Not Started: Casually choosing the placement of the top 5.
(P.S. If an opening that has made up turns out to be common, it will be disqualified. Don't think that your opening getting bolded means you lost yet!)
Enjoy!
(If you really want to know, I can tell you what I thought of your opening if you send me a PM)
Let's start off with the openings:
@SlamboJackson - London Wing Attack: Not interesting enough
@Lord_Ultron - North-Indian Attack
@JackRoach - King Defense (Eliminated in Round 1)
@Chessdude970 - Unnamed (Eliminated in Round 1)
@Ilampozhil25 - Oh No my bishop! Dahhhhhh!(Eliminated in Round 2)
@veryrabbit - Best Secret Opening(Eliminated in Round 2)
@Moonwarrior_1: Idk if this is an (Eliminated in Round 3)
Editors Note: This is just kinda... average
@Marcosevegrand - Gm vs. Noob: (Eliminated in Round 3)
Editors Note: Sorry, too Blasé again.
@JqH_415g - C3 French
Unnamed French:
@Freerobuxman - Unnamed Opening: A: No Name. B: Just too regular.
@JnZach: Kings Bong Gambit(Eliminated in Round 1)
@Prince_Usa (Too many openings submitted aaaaaa)
Alekhine's Defense: Maróczy Variation: Passive Line: Again, too bland.
Alekhine's Defense: Maróczy Variation: Aggressive Gambit: (Eliminated in Round 3)
Editors Note: This opening leaves you with a passive position... maybe it should have been called the passive-aggressive?
Alekhine's Defense: Maróczy Variation: Aggressive Line:
Alekhine's Defense: Maróczy Variation: Aggressive Line: USA variation, Gunfire Attack: Same game as the name: too long.
Saragossa Opening: Center Attack Line:
@JackRoach: Bongcloud: Nakamura Carlsen Variation(Eliminated Round 1)
@Mr_Winawer: French Winawer: Dirty Harry: (Eliminated in Round 3)
Editors Note: This was slightly too weird... sorry
@Mathieu2011: Something like that: Too boring
@DarkKnightAttack: King-Queen Shuffle Opening(Eliminated in Round 1)
@Freerobuxman: Unnamed(Eliminated in Round 1)
@Ivanzong: Reverse King's Gambit: Queenside Fianchetto Variation(I added reverse onto it, you can take it off if you say so): Way too long/boring
V.2: (Eliminated in Round 3)
Editors Note: A perfect copy of the last one with one move less. I should have removed this in Round 2.
@Yosef115: Yosef Gambit: Unfortunately, the improved Yosef Gambit was just better.
@freerobuxman: Yosef Gambit P.2
@Angryspacevoid: Kings Indian Attack Double Kingside Fianchetto Central Protection Variation: (Eliminated in Round 3)
Editors Note: Blas... you know what I'm going to say. (Hint, it ends with a é and has 5 letters.)
@Dzsoccer42:
Alekhine-Indian Game, Omega Double Gambit, Trade Variation: (Eliminated in Round 3)
Editors Note: This opening was not to my taste because of the queen movements. Sorry, but that just makes it a bit... off for me. This was still a good opening, though, but some others were better.
Scandinavian Defense: Blackburne-Kloosterboer Gambit, Danish Attack, Replied Variation: One of the trickiest openings to delete. So close to making it to the top 10.
@Alphaous: English Opening: Viper Variation:
@CastawayWill: Unnamed, Disqualified(Disqualified in Round 1)
@Mega-Pro123: Queen is bait(Eliminated in Round 2)
@stopIhaveitenough: Ryan Law how would you rate(Eliminated in Round 1)
@Ilampozhil25: Is this what you talked about(Eliminated in Round 2)
@LordUltron: Prins Variation: Premature Nadjorf: Infiltrated Knight Version: