rating on chess.com is a joke. nobody plays here seriously i doubt samuel is an actually 800 rated player in a classical setting
top 5 responses to the Sicilian ranked
Sort:
Jun 8, 2023
0
#243
SamuelAjedrez95 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
If you spend all this time on YT, worship IM (or go out of your way to hate IM Levy), opening databases, engines, opening studies and stuck at 800, I would think hard about to and make some real changes.
I'm not stuck anywhere, I just need to get better with confidence.
You should never coach anyone with your stupid bs.
How do you boost confidence?
You have to go play and gain experience.
TheSampson wrote:
I’m actually convinced Chuck is a troll
Lol at this point he definitely is. He just says stupid bs and tries to antagonise everyone for attention.
Bruh, come on guys own up. Whose alt account is Chuck? 🤣
Jun 8, 2023
0
#246
TheSampson wrote:
I’m actually convinced Chuck is a troll, it’s actually unreal how much he tries to change the discussion to “You’re bad because you’re stuck at 800” because he lost the previous one. If March and Chuck are the same person, I won’t even be surprised.
Performance is a metric. Clearly you guys are failing and lacking confidence.
How do you expect to over come that?
SamuelAjedrez95 wrote:
Bruh, come on guys own up. Whose alt account is Chuck? 🤣
I don’t even know bro, it ain’t me this time
probally that dude named ¨falling teeth¨ is who this dude is
- he thinks everyones wrong and hes right
- many of his games are 97%+ accuracy
Jun 8, 2023
0
#249
KingVandheer wrote:
TheSampson yazdı:
I’m actually convinced Chuck is a troll, it’s actually unreal how much he tries to change the discussion to “You’re bad because you’re stuck at 800” because he lost the previous one. If March and Chuck are the same person, I won’t even be surprised.
Hey now, his training regime is endlessly dabeting with people.
Gone golfing……
Chuck639 wrote:
KingVandheer wrote:
TheSampson yazdı:
I’m actually convinced Chuck is a troll, it’s actually unreal how much he tries to change the discussion to “You’re bad because you’re stuck at 800” because he lost the previous one. If March and Chuck are the same person, I won’t even be surprised.
Hey now, his training regime is endlessly dabeting with people.
Gone golfing……
gonna have to get out of your scooter first
Jun 8, 2023
0
#251
AngryPuffer wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
KingVandheer wrote:
TheSampson yazdı:
I’m actually convinced Chuck is a troll, it’s actually unreal how much he tries to change the discussion to “You’re bad because you’re stuck at 800” because he lost the previous one. If March and Chuck are the same person, I won’t even be surprised.
Hey now, his training regime is endlessly dabeting with people.
Gone golfing……
gonna have to get out of your scooter first
Try V8, real American Muscles:
Jun 8, 2023
0
#252
AngryPuffer wrote:
probally that dude named ¨falling teeth¨ is who this dude is
- he thinks everyones wrong and hes right
- many of his games are 97%+ accuracy
It’s easy to score +90 if you know how to exert positional pressure and apply basic tactics.
My end game is weak.
Chuck flexing that 1600 rated chess coach drip. GMs hate him!
Jun 8, 2023
0
#254
@Chuck639: "I get the Open Sicilian a minority of the time."
@Chuck639's games as black after 1...c5:
And @Chuck639's games as black after 2...d6:
So yes, it is "a minority of the time" that you see the Open Sicilian (if your definition of "a minority of the time" is most of the time).
Jun 8, 2023
0
#255
exceptionalfork wrote:
@Chuck639: "I get the Open Sicilian a minority of the time."
@Chuck639's games as black after 1...c5:
And @Chuck639's games as black after 2...d6:
So yes, it is "a minority of the time" that you see the Open Sicilian (if your definition of "a minority of the time" is most of the time).
What does rapid say?
Or the last 50 rapid games?
Thats more qualitative information.
Its generally when I play sober….
No way bro is 21 and spends his time on chess.com forums saying that the best response to the sicilian defense is garbage
Jun 8, 2023
0
#257
Can you filter the Sicilian lines in my rapid games in the 1500-2100 range?
Please and thank-you.
in the REAL WORLD (1600-2000)
open 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 48:48 in 27m games +0.3
Rossilimo 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 50:45 in 8m... better
Tiviakov (?) Alapin/Barmen 1. e4 c5 2. c3 d5 3. exd5 Qxd5 4.d4 51:43 @1m +0.2
closed 1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. g3 53:43@1.7m not shabby
Smith Morra Gambit:
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 51:45@10m -0.3
accepted 3...dxc3 4.Nxc3 52:44@ 5.6m -0.3 and JUST RIGHT for gambiteers and tacticians
someone on page 1 asked about the "Bowdler attack" 1.e4 c5 2.Bc4 = and scores a LOSING 45:51 in 22m games, it's GARBAGE even if stalefish sees equality
Jun 8, 2023
0
#260
1983B-Boy wrote:
in the REAL WORLD (1600-2000)
open 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 48:48 in 27m games +0.3
Rossilimo 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 50:45 in 8m... better
Tiviakov (?) Alapin/Barmen 1. e4 c5 2. c3 d5 3. exd5 Qxd5 4.d4 51:43 @1m +0.2
closed 1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. g3 53:43@1.7m not shabby
Smith Morra Gambit:
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 51:45@10m -0.3
accepted 3...dxc3 4.Nxc3 52:44@ 5.6m -0.3 and JUST RIGHT for gambiteers and tacticians
I did not play that many rapid games this year?
Thank-you for the data, I appreciate it.
I’m actually convinced Chuck is a troll, it’s actually unreal how much he tries to change the discussion to “You’re bad because you’re stuck at 800” because he lost the previous one. If March and Chuck are the same person, I won’t even be surprised.