800-900 players playing like pr0s

I am having trouble getting higher rating because 800-900 players can always fork, do some crazy pin play, or play instant attack, I have no idea how 800-900 rating playing can always do that, maybe they are low rating on purpose?

It’s more likely that you are underestimating just how good 800-900 rating is. I hear so many people put down “beginners” because they are under 1200 rating or whatever, but the global average chess rating is actually in this “beginner” rating range. I explain more about that here:

https://youtu.be/8FWEn2yIiFE?si=ec_q9pk2GyzZftjk

You’ll probably want to view the game “accuracy” in the game review and see how good your opponents are actually playing and seeing if they are consistently high or not, but make sure to watch this video first to better understand why “accuracy” can be accurate, but also misleading at times:

https://youtu.be/fXOnBJ4KX1U?si=YYnR296_CQVg_6i5

800-900 should be low rating since 1200 is default rating otherwise someone who never played a signle game of chess is a lot better than many players

I say it again I am on GM-Level. Normally I should easily have over 2400 on Lichess but thats very hard because I play in every game against Stockfish.

When the manipulation wasnt as absolute as today sometimes I got a master. These guys havent cheated. Therefore I always knew I had a very good chance to beat them.

Yes, Yes, we know you are better than stockfish, Magnus and Kasparov combined, you don’t have to mention it in every forum.

In every comment you are lying about your strength, your coaching qualities, about cheating, rating mainpulation and other stuff like that. STOP IT.

The global average I referred to is only counting “active players” on chess.com, so that means anyone who has played a chess game in the last 90 days. If someone never played a game, then even if they created their account at 1200, that won’t actually impact the statistics any.