Hypocrism wrote:
I've challenged you to an unrated game - please play this defense - I look forward to seeing how it turns out!
ok, sure, but it must be rated!
Vlyto system
Sort:
I agree with Cipherz... There are better bullet game systems.
Cipherz wrote:
Yes, but there are far superior openings for bullet.
how would you like to play a bullet game against the Vlyto system, and see how it turns out, then the chess can do the talking, thanks for the comment, I look forward to playing many challengers to the Vlyto system, and keep in mind this is going to be the first time I've unleashed the Opening System Theory on chess.com!
Chess14237 wrote:
I agree with Cipherz... There are better bullet game systems.
This is funny, let's let the chess do the talking when we play a game, but you still haven't answer the question on how to accept your indirect challenge.
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
Hypocrism wrote:
I've challenged you to an unrated game - please play this defense - I look forward to seeing how it turns out!
ok, sure, but it must be rated!
I don't play 1200s in rated games. If you want to show that this defense is good, it will have to be in an unrated game.
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
giratina999 wrote:
which wins between the Vlyto System and the Vylo System, and how do they compare to the 'double-bishop-inversed-pawn-sidefend-launcher-strategy' you advocate? keen to learn.
If you would like to learn the Vlyto System and the double-bishop-inversed-pawn-sidefend-launcher-strategy, I could send you some links from my future website. The reason my chess.com rating isn't high is because I'm always testing unique original strategies but I am capable of beating 1500 chess players. I've never actually used my Vlyto System and the double-bishop-inversed-pawn-sidefend-launcher-strategy ON CHESS.COM, because I'm composing a side flak variation to it, (I've been testing it at future chess clubs), but soon I will unleash the theories and I will beat not only 1500'ers, but 1700'ers! You could be my first student if you'd like!
i think it's admirable that you sacrifice your rating in the interest of developing new chess strategies. too many people are only interested in winning games.
Actually, I'm actually quite "new" to chess.com. I haven't been here in a REALLY LONG TIME... (left in December and only came back in late June)... so I forgot ... :(
but if we play blitz/bullet i bet i'd lose cuz i screw up in the middle game but if Bullet games were analyzed slowly (post-mortem) then id say there are better game systems
Chess14237 wrote:
Actually, I'm actually quite "new" to chess.com. I haven't been here in a REALLY LONG TIME... (left in December and only came back in late June)... so I forgot ... :(
but if we play blitz/bullet i bet i'd lose cuz i screw up in the middle game but if Bullet games were analyzed slowly (post-mortem) then id say there are better game systems
thanks for the comment, but seriously, so many people have said there are better bullet systems, do I really need to be criticized for trying to help my chess community, please, I'm only trying to help, I'm starting to regret writing forums if people keep attacking my ideas. I'm sure there's better ideas, I come up with many, I have better ideas of my own, please, ok? You may not have meant for me to feel this way, but please stop attacking it. And plus, didn't you read the part how my rating increased a ton
giratina999 wrote:
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
giratina999 wrote:
which wins between the Vlyto System and the Vylo System, and how do they compare to the 'double-bishop-inversed-pawn-sidefend-launcher-strategy' you advocate? keen to learn.
If you would like to learn the Vlyto System and the double-bishop-inversed-pawn-sidefend-launcher-strategy, I could send you some links from my future website. The reason my chess.com rating isn't high is because I'm always testing unique original strategies but I am capable of beating 1500 chess players. I've never actually used my Vlyto System and the double-bishop-inversed-pawn-sidefend-launcher-strategy ON CHESS.COM, because I'm composing a side flak variation to it, (I've been testing it at future chess clubs), but soon I will unleash the theories and I will beat not only 1500'ers, but 1700'ers! You could be my first student if you'd like!
i think it's admirable that you sacrifice your rating in the interest of developing new chess strategies. too many people are only interested in winning games.
thank you so much for your admiration, you turned the tide, I was just about to stop writing forums. Thanks! :)
Honoured to help. You owe it to chess to keep blogging.
bad troll is bad.
Aug 3, 2010
0
#33
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
aquiredtaste wrote:
This isn't even close to a draw! Nf3/Be2/O-O. If anything black is at a disadvantage due to White's complete center control and black's Queen being out and unsupported.
So how did I get that huge rating increase while using a variation of this Vlyto System. If you didn't notice, black can easily check the king in win a pawn back, while dominating rito-center control! Poison Pawn! Thanks for the comment though, it was enjoyable to read!
Rating increase??? Your still 1200! You go down two pawns for nothing and overexpose your queen! Take a look at the Caro-Kann Schenectady Variation now that is a system!
traxlerman wrote:
ZporeSuperMaster wrote:
aquiredtaste wrote:
This isn't even close to a draw! Nf3/Be2/O-O. If anything black is at a disadvantage due to White's complete center control and black's Queen being out and unsupported.
So how did I get that huge rating increase while using a variation of this Vlyto System. If you didn't notice, black can easily check the king in win a pawn back, while dominating rito-center control! Poison Pawn! Thanks for the comment though, it was enjoyable to read!
Rating increase??? Your still 1200! You go down two pawns for nothing and overexpose your queen! Take a look at the Caro-Kann Schenectady Variation now that is a system!
IF YOU ACTUALLY READ ALL OF THE COMMENTS: I have recently been sacrificing my rating for creating and testing new plans.
Yes, but there are far superior openings for bullet.