What is good about gambits?

Sort:
blueemu
Chessguy405 wrote:

I am pretty sure you don't sacrifice a minor piece in a gambit, right? 

Muzio Gambit.

 

lostpawn247
Chessguy405 wrote:
RedEye12 wrote:
Gambits involves sacrificing a piece for a strong centre or any other good reason. However, there is a difference between gambit and sacrifice. Gambits happen in the opening and involves sacrificing a pawn, knight and probably a bishop such as the King’s gambit. A sacrifice basically is sacrificing a major piece ( a queen or a rook ) for a greater good such as Legal’s mate.

 

I am pretty sure you don't sacrifice a minor piece in a gambit, right? And a sacrifice could be any piece, maybe even a pawn. But yes, you do sacrifice a pawn in a gambit.

Look up the Muzio Gambit in the Kings Gambit or the Halloween Gambit.  White sacs the king knight in those gambits.

Chessguy405
blueemu wrote:
Chessguy405 wrote:

I am pretty sure you don't sacrifice a minor piece in a gambit, right? 

Muzio Gambit.

 

 

I guess there are some that sacrifice a minor piece. But ones that you sack a minor piece are just dumb, and most of the gambits are just sacrificing pawns.

DrSpudnik

I play the Evans Gambit OTB but never on chess.com. It's no fun if people can look up continuations and throw a book (or computer) at you.