What makes c4 and c5 good??

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #1


    Obviously e4/5 and d4/5 allows scope for you bishop, and room for you queen to breath as well as control of two central squares. The c file openings only get 1 central square, and do not create scope. Why do we still continue to play it though??

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #2


    I don't :)

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #3


    haha, I have played it once or twice.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #4


    Well, for white, it is named the English opening, which allows you to later push d4 and e4, creating a huge center. For black, it is named the sicilian, which is one of the best moves for black, almost equalizing the position.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #5


    how does it equalize the position???

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #6


    It's a really good question, and the answer lies in the history of chess openings.

    For a long long time people played e4 to get the fastest mating net possible(Bc4, Nf3-e5, Qf5 or Qh5). And black played symmetrically...

    Then, white players found out that moving d4 prevents black's e5, possibly getting central control and more probably forcing black to play e6, creating development problems for at least one bishop for black player.

    Then, white understood that d4 can be met by either d5 or Nf6, restricting their own e pawn as well! Furthermore, if white plays Nc3 to strengthen this square, then the c pawn is blocked. Further further more, the blocked c pawn also blocks queen's access to d1-a4 diagonal. People understood that using this diagonal, there are tactical and strategical options. To benefit from the positional gain, people also discovered 1.Nf3 d5 2. c4 or directly 1.c4. This move gives queen d1-a4 diagonal, and also when Nc3 is played, c pawn won't be blocked.

    Further further further more, these cheesy tactics starting with c4 mostly converge on c6 square in the enemy territory, forcing enemy to put a pawn rather than a knight at this square, for example:

    I think that's why c4, and also Nf3 are good alternatives to play. This chess opening history thing goes until white plays 1.a3 and 1.h3, and even justifies those moves as well. So today, it's fine whatever you move in the first move, so long as you have a plan.Cool


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #7


    ok, thank you very much, that was interesting and helpful Laughing

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #8


    people play 1.c4 or 1.Nf3 generally to avoid some of black responses.

    catch is  , with 1.c4 white can avoid the popular Nimzo-Indian but now he must know how to reply to 1.c4 e5 and to some other options black now have . there's no such thing as an ultimate opening . each opening has it's own strengths and weakness ...

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #10



  • 3 years ago · Quote · #12


    It is a good question, but I don't think anyone has answered it well yet.

    Let's compare 1.d4 d5 to 1.e4 e5.  After the latter, White commonly plays 2.Nf3, which is a threat to capture the black e-pawn, and to which Black has to respond.  After 1.d4 d5, however, 2.Nc3 is not effective in the same way, because the queen defends the pawn.  Since straightforward piece play is ineffective at creating threats in the center, White must hit at d5 with a pawn first -- hence, c4.

    The same principle applies to the assorted move orders of the flank openings.  1.c4 is contesting control of d5, without committing to where White will put his d-pawn.  Converse examples from the black side (e.g., Benoni 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5) have a similar rationale as well.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #13


    here is typical low level c4 game 10 0 

    had black not 10... Na5 I would have tried to develop my dark bishop and rook on a1 to c1 ??

    I like c4 for its solid pressure on the center and flexablity.  Unlike coming with d4 straight away I find many more mid game goals are available. 

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #14


    ok, thanks to all who have answered

Back to Top

Post your reply: