What's wrong with 1.b4?

Sort:
schlechter55

to be more precise,  a person like Pfren would be thrown out of every chess club for his arrogance and insults.

pfren

Oh... I have my own club, so I wouldn't possibly be thrown out of there. You would though, since you don't know chess.

schlechter55

ok, Pfren, let me try it for the last time:

you confirmed in #183, that my view of 1.b4 , explained in # 6, 10, 92 and 178, was correct.

 Nevertheless, you claim that I do not know chess, referring to none of my claims here.

Not enough of that, you insult me again and again, and have no minimum strength to admit that you said something wrong.

---

Thx for admitting that you are your own club (because you just wouldn't stand other people).

pfren

I own my own club because I have a reason, which is none of your business.

I don't insult you, I just stress the fact you are completely clueless- again, for a reason.

Regards.

GreedyPawnGrabber

I wanna sign up in Pffffren's club. But last time I talked to him he was angry at me - he thought I have topped him on the rating list of the biggest troll on the site...! I hope that won't be a problem cause everybody knows it is not true.

schlechter55

GIVE us a reason.

Fact is, there is no chess argument you stressed in this forum, that was not also given by me (except that you prefer the plan f5, and I prefer Nf6 g6 Bg7, in the system 1.b4 e5, 2.Bb2 d6; you also said that your choice of f5 would be a matter of taste).

It obviously hurst you that i gave the two plans 1.b4 e5, 2.Bb2 Bxb4 and 2....d6 as best plans for Black FIRST.

And to make it again clear, there is no chess argument that you gave here, that would contradict any of mine.

I think you have problem with people who compete with you.

May be your mom told you too often how great you are, lol.

Given your age, there is little hope you can change this anymore.

In that respect, the best you have left is indeed to make your own club, where you can talk to the walls, and the wall is full of your fotos...

pfren

I am sorry, but I don't have any intention opening a dialog with anonymous cowards anymore.

I will, if you pay. I will charge you $200 per hour- a very friendly price.

GreedyPawnGrabber

Just don't mess with Pffffffren or you will get your butt kicked...! He is no joke you patzer! Pffff, and say thank you cause he didn't ask you to pay 200$ for his goat cheese.

SmyslovFan

Pfren, why not create a club on this site?

pfren
SmyslovFan wrote:

Pfren, why not create a club on this site?

Because I think it's a silly idea.

GreedyPawnGrabber
SmyslovFan wrote:

Pfren, why not create a club on this site?

 Yes, please! Meanwhile we can only have our little Pffren fanclub here.

chasm1995

I absolutely enjoy the dialogue between pfren and everybody else. Laughing  Good humor for the chess.com community.

Gamboo

The Sokolsky is fertile ground. It's often transpositional to other more respected systems, and it's independant lines are off-beat.  Arguably not the sharpest opening (giving the opponent a tight range of moves and order) but Fischer and several Grand Masters have played it occasionally.

And Fisher never played to not-lose.

TetsuoShima
Gamboo wrote:

The Sokolsky is fertile ground. It's often transpositional to other more respected systems, and it's independant lines are off-beat.  Arguably not the sharpest opening (giving the opponent a tight range of moves and order) but Fischer and several Grand Masters have played it occasionally.

And Fisher never played to not-lose.

really fischer played the sokolosky?? 

TetsuoShima
[COMMENT DELETED]
pfren
TetsuoShima wrote:
really fischer played the sokolosky?? 

No.

schlechter55

Greedypawngrabber. You just did not follow up this thread. Everybody who actually did, will admit that my opinions in chess were never challenged by this rooster Pfren.

You are the same as him.

schlechter55

I challenged greedypawngrabber to a game. lets see if he is a coward as theothers who do not answer to my challenges.

pfren

I don't deny answering your questions, little "Estonian" man.

But you must pay first, I don't educate arrogant anonymous dumbfooks for free.

schlechter55

the arrogance was never mine, but yours. For me, such dialogue was closed long ago.

I just gave you (and the many other cowards and indifferent or just lazy people on this forum) the chance to wake up. It is hopeless, I guess.