I feel like KG gives much better tactical play
Which is better KG or QG

The pawn structures may be the same early in the game but d4 is already defended and e4 isn't. I believe also that by playing f4 ITS ON THE K-SIDE so no, it doesn't have the same strategical central strike c4 has.

No turning back and as the cat is out the bag.
I see some people getting into arguements and finding a new home.

Come on. I like the argument plan. Need some entertainment. Since I'm not going out on a Friday night and get to troll with y'all, Ill open another one and sit back and watch the carnage.

Come on. I like the argument plan. Need some entertainment. Since I'm not going out on a Friday night and get to troll with y'all, Ill open another one and sit back and watch the carnage.
As for me, I just came back home and I'm going to bed, but well, I will still follow this thread.
I take a bet : 10 pages in one day, locked between pages 30-35.

Oh this is going to entertaining! The most insults per thread period. Not going to last due to that . 10 years later members will still read this thread and fight over it.
I feel like QG gives much better positional play... your thoughts?