Why play the bird's opening?

Sort:
sndeww
Riverlandjack wrote:

No Preusseagro you can beat me of course but not with Froms gambit.

I switch to the good old KG.

I'd rather go into a from's.

ebobsterhelp
Dear Ukrainedude:
The idea of the bird opening for white is:
1 Deny black use of e5;
2 white plants his knight on e5 as part of his king side attack;
3 If black exchanges off the e5 knight (& white can’t replace it with his other knight or dark square bishop) then re-taking on e5 (with the f-pawn) cramps black’s kingside & opens for white the f file to get more pieces into the king side attack, including rook lifts to f3, g3 or h3; sometimes even f6.
4. White should fianchetto his dark square bishop so it bears down on e5, f6 & especially g7. I won hundreds of games bc of the power of this bishop.
5. White basically aims to play a good form of the classical Dutch defense up a tempo. The Bird is playable against both king’s Indian defense d6 set-ups & e6/d5 set ups though the former requires special attention to move order & knowledge of tactical motifs.
6 White ends up with an extra pawn &/or a better game against popular antidote for black - the From Gambit, if white plays correctly.
7 the opening is offbeat & tactical; often white wins quickly.
8. The main drawback is its limited scope - if black plays the best lines correctly it’s hard for white to mix it up & just one misstep & black may grab too much space etc.
Hope that summary helps!
sndeww
Preusseagro wrote:

Nah i won more often with black.

nah I win more with white

Riverlandjack
Preusseagro schreef:

Nah i won more often with black.

Because he don't played against a specialist like me.

Riverlandjack
Preusseagro schreef:

Or maybe later i have to work so i going to sleep now

Better take some sleep dude.

GREATHIKER

night here

 

Steven-ODonoghue

Stop Advertising, if you want to promote your club go to the Clubs and Teams section of the forums. What you are doing is also spamming therefore I have reported you

ukrainiandude
Steven-ODonoghue wrote:

Stop Advertising, if you want to promote your club go to the Clubs and Teams section of the forums. What you are doing is also spamming therefore I have reported you

same

GREATHIKER

hi

 

Riverlandjack

There are several reasons why Henry played the Bird. 

 

Courage.

Originality.

Creativity.

He was the founding father of this interesting weapon. 

This man played against Morphy, Anderssen and Steinitz.I agree he lost a lot of games against these giants. But this three players yeah.......

But when you have courage,Creativity and originality. 

Three reasons....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Riverlandjack

Chess players are like parrots. When the big MC take a switch everybody will play the Bird.

Lion_kingkiller

Yawn. Bird's opening is rubbish. Or certainly inferior. Same as Grob. And h4. Because moving one of the kings 3 pawn defence, on the opening move... is a rather silly idea? And showing some ancient Morphy game don't change that. Of course, dumb opening can still win... but still dumb. Exception proving the rule.

sndeww
LionWillCrush wrote:

Yawn. Bird's opening is rubbish. Or certainly inferior. Same as Grob. And h4. Because moving one of the kings 3 pawn defence, on the opening move... is a rather silly idea? And showing some ancient Morphy game don't change that. Of course, dumb opening can still win... but still dumb. Exception proving the rule.

well you don't see too many GMs playing Grob's!

Lion_kingkiller

Grob is a patzers fave, too. Like Bird, but more dumb.

Riverlandjack
LionWillCrush schreef:

Yawn. Bird's opening is rubbish. Or certainly inferior. Same as Grob. And h4. Because moving one of the kings 3 pawn defence, on the opening move... is a rather silly idea? And showing some ancient Morphy game don't change that. Of course, dumb opening can still win... but still dumb. Exception proving the rule.

The Bird Will never die don't talk about Grob.Respect man respect.When you are gone Birdie is still hanging around.

Joseph_Truelsons_Fan
chessPlatypus01 wrote:

i play barnes and scicilian

whattttt

1. f3??

sndeww
Joseph_Truelsons_fan wrote:
chessPlatypus01 wrote:

i play barnes and scicilian

whattttt

1. f3!!!

Transposes into the dangerous KING's GAMBIT!

I made the pieces weird on purpose

lcravethatmineral
SNUDOO wrote:
Joseph_Truelsons_fan wrote:
chessPlatypus01 wrote:

i play barnes and scicilian

whattttt

1. f3!!!

Transposes into the dangerous KING's GAMBIT!

I made the pieces weird on purpose

Your design is ugly.

Riverlandjack

Well allright boys with great respect Snudoo a funny game.But this is a party of Ukrainiandude.Let us talk about the Bird.

Riverlandjack

Where is Preusseagro?The anti man.