I'm not sure but I think it's a matter of fashion. The kings's indian was considered dubious by players like Petrosian but then Kasparov came along and combined his superior opening preparation with his powerful dynamic play. He revived the king's indian somehow until Kramnik came along and had much success with the bayonet attack.
Kramnik also introduced the russian defense as a defense against e4 on high level chess. Later he helped the berlin defense to greater popularity. So the current world champion has also an influence on what is played on top level and to some extent on amateurs.
Alekhine and Capablanca played the queens gambit (declined) a lot actually if I'm not mistaken in every game of their world championship match. And it was a pretty popular defense against 1.d4 in that time.
I think the sames goes for the sicilian taimanov. But I'm not strong enough to make any objective evaluation.
It's the only sicilian where Black and not white gets the initiative in the start of the game (When black plays Bb4, White suffers a lot to defend the e4 pawn and most times lose it). Why isn't it much played in the high levels ?