Why would anyone use the damiano defense????

Sort:
Uhohspaghettio1
rychessmaster1 wrote:
Uhohspaghettio1 wrote:
neveraskmeforadraw wrote:

@rychessmaster1 dude you're like 1864 fide.

 

His blitz seems impressive at a glance and he claims to have beaten gms... but then you realize he plays them all without increment so yeah... that doesn't count for much. He has a rapid rating of 2031 which is ok but nothing to write home about.

Plenty of people here would beat him whether he plays the damiano defence or the normal 2. ...Nc6. 

 

Ok I’ll play you in rapid and still beat you with f6 lol

Also my FIDE does really suck ngl

What sort of retard are you? 

 

Uhohspaghettio1
BalticSovetsky wrote:
Uhohspaghettio1 wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
Uhohspaghettio1 wrote:
neveraskmeforadraw wrote:

@rychessmaster1 dude you're like 1864 fide.

 

His blitz seems impressive at a glance and he claims to have beaten gms... but then you realize he plays them all without increment so yeah... that doesn't count for much. He has a rapid rating of 2031 which is ok but nothing to write home about.

Plenty of people here would beat him whether he plays the damiano defence or the normal 2. ...Nc6. 

 

Ok I’ll play you in rapid and still beat you with f6 lol

Also my FIDE does really suck ngl

What sort of retard are you? 

 

he is a retard that is better than u at chess, deal with it

except for the fact that his FIDE sucks.

Great because I never claimed I was better than him, noone here did. 

Uhohspaghettio1

His real name is Ryan Amburghy and he's a 16 year old child. 

Just because he is 16 doesn't excuse how stupid and obnoxious he is. 

badbeatbobby

I thought I had discovered it years ago but, later found out that it is a known opening.

badbeatbobby

I then researched it and saw that it was played by Fisher and is somewhat playable, although I would never play it!!