Hence the U.S. government had neither the right nor the moral ground to condemn Fischer for allegedly "breaching" U.N. sanctions.
I do not think anyone has the right or moral ground to condemn anyone for breaching meaningless U.N. sanctions. Nothing the U.N. ever does is binding in any way. They theoretically have the power to enforce their measures, but they never will. They have no real power.
Yes, if someone doesn't have the power to blow me up they have no moral right to say anything. Really a genious philosophical argument, and I am impressed by the education that you are getting. However, the US as a nation decided to participate in those sanctions, so strictly speaking F. was in breach of US laws, not of UN sanctions.
Hence the U.S. government had neither the right nor the moral ground to condemn Fischer for allegedly "breaching" U.N. sanctions.
I do not think anyone has the right or moral ground to condemn anyone for breaching meaningless U.N. sanctions. Nothing the U.N. ever does is binding in any way. They theoretically have the power to enforce their measures, but they never will. They have no real power.