Chess Player of the Month June 2011

Sort:
oinquarki
KeViN246 wrote:
oinquarki wrote:
KeViN246 wrote:

im votin for the fraggle


I already voted for it twice...

Brb.


gonna vote a third time?


Yeah; I voted for trysts' pic that time too.

oinquarki

Cpotm is awesome; I nominate proknight for making these threads.

Cystem_Phailure
EZap wrote:

Yes WellRead for his unpretentious posts...trysts is my 2nd choice

 


2nd choice for what?  We're not voting yet, and WellRead and trysts are both already on the nominated list.

KeViN246

down in fraggle rock :)

oinquarki
EZap wrote:

 as long as the thought was there is what counts...


Exactly.

Cystem_Phailure
oinquarki wrote:

Cpotm is awesome; I nominate proknight for making these threads.


Yeah, he won't run, but how about if over the next few hours each of us sends him a trophy?  I just sent him a Heart of a Lion trophy.

oinquarki

http://www.chess.com/members/trophy_view?id=5012829

I don't bowl.

oinquarki

Cystem_Phailure
EZap wrote:  Go read some of WellReads logorrhea, maybe you can learn something like Trysts. Now go away.

. . . and on his 9th day as a member, he appointed himself as an expert on all the little forum denizens and history . . . 

trysts
Cystem_Phailure wrote:
EZap wrote:  Go read some of WellReads logorrhea, maybe you can learn something like Trysts. Now go away.

. . . and on his 9th day as a member, he appointed himself as an expert on all the little forum denizens and history . . . 


I'm kind of curious about what I learnedLaughing

oinquarki
Cystem_Phailure wrote:
EZap wrote:  Go read some of WellReads logorrhea, maybe you can learn something like Trysts. Now go away.

. . . and on his 9th day as a member, he appointed himself as an expert on all the little forum denizens and history . . . 


 Laughing

trysts
LordNazgul wrote:

I don't think trysts is much into agreeing with anyone.


I don't agree.

oinquarki

Experiment;

 

  1. Statement A is true.
  2. Statement A is false.

 

Trysts, do you agree with either of the above options?

ivandh

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teMlv3ripSM

TheGrobe

I thought it went like this:

1. Statement 2 is false
2. Statement 1 is true 

trysts
oinquarki wrote:

Experiment;

 

Statement A is true. Statement A is false.

 

Trysts, do you agree with either of the above options?


I don't agree that the outline of your "experiment" is complete.

proKnight98

List:

TheGrobe

Estragon

ChessMarksTheSpot

oinquarki

WellRead

Windows-7_

trysts

wafflemaster

pdela

ivandh

electricpawn

elubas

suspiciousclowns

AnthonyCG

Cystem_Phailure

ajedricito

mistercheese

kco

MsJean

[COMMENT I DELETED]

KeViN246
MsJean wrote:
[COMMENT DELETED]

i agree 100%

ivandh
EZap wrote:

W

Cystem_Phailure wrote:
EZap wrote:  Go read some of WellReads logorrhea, maybe you can learn something like Trysts. Now go away.

. . . and on his 9th day as a member, he appointed himself as an expert on all the little forum denizens and history . . . 


 Well how long did it take you to figure things out?


Asks the guy who can't figure out which side of the quote to write his post in.