HessianWarrior
Chess Player of the Month June 2012
Sort:
BestPlayer next time : )
List:
AnnaZC 1
DrSpudnik 1
HessianWarrior 1
joeydvivre 1
pfren
theoreticalboy 1
Now we will vote for a Head of Nominees. The HON has the power to select two members from the list above for elimination. This is currently following step two in the voting rules stated in the first post.
You have one vote to vote for a Head of Nominees, and voting ends June 14 11:59 PM Pacific.
HessianWarrior wrote:
@ proKnight- Hey PK, if the Sh#t ain't being stirred everybody starts snoozing. A hundred and one posts and less than 2000 views for half a month. The last post was 33 hours ago and it was yours. Why don't you encourage the Sh#t to hit the fan, that's why we're here.
George1st wrote:
HessianWarrior
Figures.
Dr. Spudnik
Really...another one. May was a mess, this is pointless.
*I'm not tracking this thread so don't bother to reply*
I vote for Joeydvivre because people call him a doctor and professor as he said. He has a good record in chess ratings. He back up his logic and reasons through statistics and numbers. He must also be good in science.
I voted for the good Dr. because he is a scientist also. Although, you are now making me wonder if I made the right choice, since I haven't seen any statistics from him.
Before I forget, can I nominate snakesbelly for being diligent in reporting players who won against him with lower ratings as cheaters. Most of all for not being rude.
TMITIMW state:
I voted for the good Dr. because he is a scientist also. Although, you are now making me wonder if I made the right choice, since I haven't seen any statistics from him.
Well he just claimed he uses it to justify his logic when they argued with GMPrice.
DrSpudnik wrote:
Statistics, eh?
Did you know that half the people are below average!
Not necessarily, for example the vast majority of the population have more legs than average.
joeydvivre
Did you know that playing chess is good for you. Statistics show if you play chess every day for 100 years, you will live to an old age. 
I nominate no one for this purposeless and unsanctioned "award." What is the point? It seems like a giant circle-jerk to me, and I have no qualms saying so.
I'm pretty sure my blunt honesty puts me out of the running. I am OK with this.
wilford-n wrote:
I nominate no one for this purposeless and unsanctioned "award." What is the point? It seems like a giant circle-jerk to me, and I have no qualms saying so.
I'm pretty sure my blunt honesty puts me out of the running. I am OK with this.
Fair point
Yeah, caught on pretty quick...
I inteded my vote for joeydvivre above to be for the Head of Nominees for the reasons above.