Hikaru Nakamura is better than Magnus Carlsen?

Sort:
jgnLpaShalat

 2 good player

davidmayfield
Magnus is better but Hikaru is still an incredible player
SurgeonDoge_123

Disadvantages: Carlsen is great at slow chess and takes his time.

Advantages: Nakamura is a quick thinker and fast player. Due to the fast timing, Carlsen would not be able to think very much.

Aditi3572

Both players are incredible at chess. 

AunTheKnight
YangyangShenorBabyKoi wrote:

Disadvantages: Carlsen is great at slow chess and takes his time.

Advantages: Nakamura is a quick thinker and fast player. Due to the fast timing, Carlsen would not be able to think very much.

Carlsen is blitz champion.

MrIndia
AunTheKnight wrote:
YangyangShenorBabyKoi wrote:

Disadvantages: Carlsen is great at slow chess and takes his time.

Advantages: Nakamura is a quick thinker and fast player. Due to the fast timing, Carlsen would not be able to think very much.

Carlsen is blitz champion.

No point arguing with naka fans, they are sort of blind followers

AunTheKnight
MrIndia wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
YangyangShenorBabyKoi wrote:

Disadvantages: Carlsen is great at slow chess and takes his time.

Advantages: Nakamura is a quick thinker and fast player. Due to the fast timing, Carlsen would not be able to think very much.

Carlsen is blitz champion.

No point arguing with naka fans, they are sort of blind followers

Yes lol. I was thinking that they just watch Hikaru’s streams. The depressing thing is that they were 1700 blitz and don’t know anything about Carlsen, and just blindly follow Nakamura.

velan190109

IMO the 3 best chess players of all time

1.Magnus Carlsen

2.Viswanathan Anand

3.Vladimir Kramnik

SurgeonDoge_123

I do know about Carlsen

SurgeonDoge_123

I'll say their tied

Quasimorphy

I think Carlsen broke Nakamura.  That's why Hikaru has declined so much in Classical, IMO.

LeWoeps

Hikaru is an awesome chess player.   
But I believe he's ranked in the top 30 or top 20 at this moment regarding classical.
And he's ranked Second for blitz.    Sooooo no,   at this moment he's not better then Magnus

mpaetz

     FIDE has a years-long process of qualifying tournaments and matches to select the challenger for a match vs the world champion. Magnus Carlsen has successfully gone through this process and become world champion, then defended his title. Nakamura has not. Should he succeed in the next cycle, then he can be considered as better than Carlsen.

BroiledRat
Magnus is his superior in all time controls, only the most deluded would believe Nakamura is his better. :)
Cobra2721

OK, I like Hikaru, but Magnus is better

Stil1
TanVibrantMonk wrote:

Hikaru is only good at bullet and blitz ...

Hikaru is a super grandmaster in classical, too.

For perspective:

- Titled masters are the top 1% of all chess players.

- Grandmasters are the top 1% of all titled masters.

- Super grandmasters (like Hikaru) are the top 1% of all grandmasters.

 

Yes, Magnus is the undisputed king of the hill. His accomplishments speak for themselves.

But give Hikaru credit where credit is due ...

DreamscapeHorizons

Yes, Hikaru is a stellar player. Great skill. But... The Magster is better than Hikaru at classical, rapid, blitz, aaaand bullet, even 960. Not only in real over the board play but even in online competition too. They've played many blitz & bullet games right here on chess.com. Anybody can look the results up. The Magster is likely better in rock/paper/scissors, badminton, & connect 4 too. 

llama47
infestationPit wrote:
Heinrich_Zwei wrote:

Only an American would say Nakamura is better

Correct. 

I think it's mostly stupid children who don't know anything about chess outside of twitch / youtube.

Stil1
DreamscapeHorizons wrote:

Yes, Hikaru is a stellar player. Great skill. But... The Magster is better than Hikaru at classical, rapid, blitz, aaaand bullet, even 960. Not only in real over the board play but even in online competition too.

Magnus definitely holds the top spot in the blitz/rapid format, though Hikaru seems to be climbing.

In the St. Louis Blitz/Rapid leg of the 2021 Grand Chess Tour, Hikaru walked all over the top players in attendance. He went all 27 rounds undefeated.

Magnus didn't participate in the GCT, unfortunately. No doubt, he would've contributed some stellar games.

And it would've been fun to see him and Hikaru clash yet again.

Though 960 is the one format where Carlsen can't claim total dominance. There, Wesley So is the current king. Surprisingly, even Magnus seems to stand no chance against him.

fabelhaft
Stil1 wrote:
DreamscapeHorizons wrote:

Yes, Hikaru is a stellar player. Great skill. But... The Magster is better than Hikaru at classical, rapid, blitz, aaaand bullet, even 960. Not only in real over the board play but even in online competition too.

Magnus definitely holds the top spot in the blitz/rapid format, though Hikaru seems to be climbing.

In the St. Louis Blitz/Rapid leg of the 2021 Grand Chess Tour, Hikaru walked all over the top players in attendance. He went all 27 rounds undefeated.

Magnus didn't participate in the GCT, unfortunately. No doubt, he would've contributed some stellar games.

And it would've been fun to see him and Hikaru clash yet again.

They did face each other many times in the Champions Chess Tour this year, in the six events both played Carlsen finished ahead of Nakamura every time. So S:t Louis was a bit of an outlier in Nakamura's case.

As for Carlsen standing no chance against So in Chess960, that was certainly the case in the 2019 final of the first World Championship. But as far as I recall Carlsen has won the other Chess960 events he played and that was the one where he finished second, so difficult to say if he just had a bad event that one time.