Forums

Save BronsteinPawn

Sort:
IceApprentease

Would you want him to be unmuted? I'll vote for yes because he was a really funny troll.

Votes:

Yes - 8

No - 1

Average Yeses: 5

ilikewindmills
1
Shinkuuzz

Yes

IceApprentease

The Average Yeses are the difference between the yes and no.

justlikechess

No way, he is better off muted!

General-TsoTso

unmute brownstainpawn, just give the forums to the trolls and start a new set of forums for proper members.

Jenium

Yes from me. Is he still muted?

ArgoNavis

1st Ammendment, I say.

 

 

inb4 somebody says it doesn't apply to a private website.

DrSpudnik

Why was he muted?

FM_Checkmate

I want Bronstein to be unmuted!

FM_Checkmate
justlikechess wrote:

No way, he is better off muted!

surprise.png Why?

General-TsoTso

He is unmuted in about 15 sockpuppets.

fuzzbug

phpEE5rkz.jpeg

CookedQueen
General-TsoTso wrote:

unmute brownstainpawn, just give the forums to the trolls and start a new set of forums for proper members.

One forum for the trolls and one for failed trolls (what you call proper members)?

Doesn't work. Every group will devide after a while into real trolls and wanna be trolls. Then the same question occurs again.

General-TsoTso

no, the proper members are the regular human beings.

the trolls would keep getting relegated back to the troll divisions.

LogoCzar

Also relevant:

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-players/petition-to-unmute-bronsteinpawn

CookedQueen

Doens't matter how you call or define the group. Someday a homogeneous group will devide and split apart as I said before. That's just the nature of any society.

General-TsoTso

that's a very defeatist attitude, chess.com was once a good site.

CookedQueen
General-TsoTso wrote:

that's a very defeatist attitude, chess.com was once a good site.

Attitude? Lol, facts of social behavior has nothing to do with attitude.

ArgoNavis
General-TsoTso wrote:

that's a very defeatist attitude, chess.com was once a good site.

Are we talking about the same website?