I am 12 and my fide rating is 1894. When i was 10 i was 1778. Yes 2 years no improvement. 10 is the age where your rating goes up and you don't know what you are doing. After my rating touched 1778 opening was my everything. Now after working in my middlegame and endgame my rating boosted up very fast. Cheers!
What should a 10-11 year old's rating be?
Sort:
10 year old rating???? the question is meaningless what do u expect a 10 year old to do when there are all the experienced people and brains ruling the game
May 22, 2017
0
#24
bighusky22 wrote:
What should a 10-11 year old's rating be? I really don't know. I am in that category and have a very high 1400 standard but I don't play on that much. I play more on my blitz ten min. games which my rating is 1000.
That is high for a 10-11 years old. I am 34 years old but my rating is low. It is better for you to read some articles about young grandmasters so you will have an inspiration. If you have have an inspiration, you will work harder, harder and harder and aim to be one of the young grandmasters that ever lived on Earth.
May 22, 2017
0
#25
atchess91 wrote:
I am 12 and my fide rating is 1894. When i was 10 i was 1778. Yes 2 years no improvement. 10 is the age where your rating goes up and you don't know what you are doing. After my rating touched 1778 opening was my everything. Now after working in my middlegame and endgame my rating boosted up very fast. Cheers!
You don't need to work on your middlegame and endgame. You are better than me, but that is not advisable. Just study tactics and reassess your games.
May 22, 2017
0
#26
jijithoson wrote:
2315 for 11 years, 2250 for 10 year old.
Then work harder, your aim must to be a world champion. That rating is high.
May 23, 2017
0
#27
tripple_attack wrote:
atchess91 wrote:
I am 12 and my fide rating is 1894. When i was 10 i was 1778. Yes 2 years no improvement. 10 is the age where your rating goes up and you don't know what you are doing. After my rating touched 1778 opening was my everything. Now after working in my middlegame and endgame my rating boosted up very fast. Cheers!
You don't need to work on your middlegame and endgame. You are better than me, but that is not advisable. Just study tactics and reassess your games.
I am a Indian 1800! India is tough!
May 23, 2017
0
#28
bighusky22 wrote:
What should a 10-11 year old's rating be? I really don't know. I am in that category and have a very high 1400 standard but I don't play on that much. I play more on my blitz ten min. games which my rating is 1000.
That's so impressive... give me your skills!
Ummm, I think between 50 and 2500 if your 2500+ and you're 10-11 you will be a master someday
The youngest International Master was Praggnanandhaa, age 10 years 10 months.
World Youth Chess Championship has under-12 section since 1986. The winners include Samuel Sevian, in 2012. What is the typical Elo of the U-12 World Chess Championship winners? Sevian was under 2400 - reached 2400 only a year later, aged 12 years 10 months.
I'm 9 and my rating is 1568 so when I'm about 11 I should be about 1800 right? but really it depends when you start
im 11 - 1600ish
For every year you wait to start playing chess subtract 100 points from 3000 and add your current rating divided by ten- that is the maximum rating you will ever be able to hit according to quantum mechanics and general relativity-
f(x) = 3000 - age * 100 + elo/10
I started at 36 years old and my current rating is 1080 so my maximum possible rating is -420.
This is the advantage of starting young in chess.
Depends on where you are from. Rating is relative and if you are from a country like India or some other country with a lot of competition then you might be "underrated" compared to some other country. If you are asking for an average value I have to disappoint you as there are too many outliers.
ChessProGirl wrote:
Roger436 wrote:
I'm 9 and my rating is 1568 so when I'm about 11 I should be about 1800 right? but really it depends when you start
Wait is that your USCF or FiDE rating
USCF
AlphaZeroDark30 wrote:
Nakamura hit 2750 at age fourteen. How much has he gained in the last twenty years? Kamsky hit 2700 at fourteen. What's he now? There's a lot of known theory that one can emulate to get to 2600-2800, but after that they stop dead in their tracks. At some point a dominant player is just going to blast everyone like Fischer did and cross 3000.
The reason people peak at 2700 is there is no one left to get any significant elo points from. When you are 2700 and you beat a 2400 or 2500 what do you get? 1 or 2 points? For Carlsen, Nakamura, Aronian, Vishy, etc... they don't have anyone left to play except each other. ELO is a relative scale, not absolute, so it starts to lose accuracy as you get to the extremes of the spectrum.
AndBell wrote:
AlphaZeroDark30 wrote:
Nakamura hit 2750 at age fourteen. How much has he gained in the last twenty years? Kamsky hit 2700 at fourteen. What's he now? There's a lot of known theory that one can emulate to get to 2600-2800, but after that they stop dead in their tracks. At some point a dominant player is just going to blast everyone like Fischer did and cross 3000.
The reason people peak at 2700 is there is no one left to get any significant elo points from. When you are 2700 and you beat a 2400 or 2500 what do you get? 1 or 2 points? For Carlsen, Nakamura, Aronian, Vishy, etc... they don't have anyone left to play except each other. ELO is a relative scale, not absolute, so it starts to lose accuracy as you get to the extremes of the spectrum.
In the first (unofficial) Elo list of June 1967, Spassky and Fischer shared first place with equally 2670 points. By July 1972, Fischer was 2785 points, Spassky 2660, and everybody else (Petrosian, Polugaevsky...) 2645 or under.
How much should Carlsen win to reach 2950 points, 125 points ahead of everyone else? Like Caruana - 12 draws. How many wins would have bumped Carlsen to 2950?
2315 for 11 years, 2250 for 10 year old.