16972 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is indeed a very broad topic, depending on your definition of an offensively focused chess player, often called a tactician, but I was interested in the question in my title. Who can be called the greatest attacker of all time in chess? I suppose it depends upon your criteria when it comes to tactically oriented players. Some may say Kasparov due to pure dominance and accuracy; some may say Tal because his moves were just too good to be true. Whatever the criteria, I wanted to hear all of your opinions on this.
Nezhmetdinov was a fantastic attacker (and he beat many world class players including world champions).
Wow, you're right! I just found a fascinating game in which he defeated the Magician himself:http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1102235
Something good has come already from this thread :)
Two more of his famous games.
Tal, Alekhine, Anderssen, Kasparov, Morphy.
My top 5 attacking players all time.
I haven't studied many master games but going through Masters of the chessboard I have to say I really liked Both Paul morphy and Adolph Andersen. Whether they are or not I think is irrelevent. Now if I had to pick a favorite player, probably...Well I am not sure.
Tal for the wildest, most aggressive
Petrosian for the accuracy and sacrifice, while playing stiffling defense
Fischer for intimidation and the will to aggressively play for the win
Capablanca for simplicity and visualization of how to seize a victory
Petrosian and Capablanca were hardly attacking players...(in my opinion)
I think I agree with abiogenesis23.
If your plan of attack was to play good defensive and establish good position first, in order to have a good attack...I'd say that makes you a good attacker...the question wasn't who was the most aggressive or relentless....it was who was most effective.... Capablanca is considered one of the most error free players ever....sounds like he was continually moving forward with near flawless attacks to me....he didn't lose muc
Petrosian was a tactician, who was known for accurate sacs, like rooks for bishop pairs and was even compared to Tal by Russian master....it just so happened that in his set up for attack....he often employed a prophylactic position, resulting in a crushing positional attack, giving way to unthwartable tactics.....sounds like a damn good methodical attacker to....besides, anyone who says a world chess champion isn't a good attacker and among the greatest ever, perhaps needs to reevaluate who really has what skills.....
Of course all world champions are great attackers and tactical players but to say that Petrosian more known for technique, defense and endgame play is the equal of Tal in combinations and tactics would not be accurate. If I said Tal who as a world champion also was a great defensive player and endgame player this would be accurate not not compared to Petrosian. Who was the all round better player between the two I would go with Petrosian but not having the tactical, attacking or combination ability the equal of Tal. Tal and Alekhine about a toss here.
Shirov is my choice. He is a better attacker than Tal. In Tal's peak, very few GMs have excellent defense technique. Shirov shows his attacking prowess to the best defensive GM's (excluding Kasparov and Karpov).
I think it is Gata Kamsky's Dad who is the greatest attacker.
I can't disagree with you Gata :)
Already to post #19 before the first Shirov mention. A travesty.
Why do people have higher fide ratings than a few decades ago?
by trollmickey 7 minutes ago
Unpopularity in America
by 7ofKnight 12 minutes ago
cheating (by playing for a draw)
by Julius-Geezer 17 minutes ago
2305 is just a number...
by Robert_New_Alekhine 18 minutes ago
Tales of a Septuagenarian
by ponz111 21 minutes ago
Member Analysis Auditions
by Pooya-Khodadadi 28 minutes ago
Women’s World Chess Championship - Round 9
by Pooya-Khodadadi 29 minutes ago
Read This Before You Post
Looking for relayers of live chess events
by Pooya-Khodadadi 31 minutes ago
Bean Gambit in the Sicilian Najdorf
by RandomBean 32 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!