Would Bobby Fischer

Sort:
dunce

Bobby Fischer's not dead, and he's here on Chess.com as Windows-7_.

Tyzer
notlesu wrote:

I think he developed passions late in life---food, drink, and girls---hence---TRYSTS.

She may even have developed a liking for Fischer's DOMINATION!

I think most women (if they are honest) love to be dominated.


This has gone out of the realms of "sexist" and straight into the uncharted territories of "creepy".

ActiveResistance
Wouter_Remmerswaal wrote:

So what would Bobby Fischer do if he was here right now?
He'd make a plan and he'd followed trough, that's what Bobby Fischer would do!
When Bobby Fischer traveld in time to the year 2010.
He joined chess.com and shocked the chess world again.


 This is possibly the most fantastic post I've ever read on this site.

Oh, and no one likes Brian Dennehy.

-X-
dunce wrote:

Bobby Fischer's not dead, and he's here on Chess.com as Windows-7_.


I have seen a lot of people write a lot of bad things about Bobby Fischer and I know that some of them are true. This insult however, crosses the line. Bobby Fischer is a legend for his awesome chess playing ability. Windows is no legend whatsoever, and the little recognition he has received, is for being a big wannabe and has nothing to do with chess playing ability.

Deranged

Yes, he would join for practice, but he would remain anonymous so that he does not harm his reputation and he would not become a teacher.

theoreticalboy

Yes, but then woodshover blocked me, unfortunately, so I guess that dream has died.  Or perhaps....

One should consider developing knights before bishops, as with extra time pawn structures become more established, and it is more obvious where bishops are best placed.  This principle is similar to that which states that one should consider visiting the chess.com forums before one has eaten anything that day, as within the stomach there will be less material available to be converted for vomitous ends for that moment one stumbles across the sado-masochistic fantasies of notlesu.  Such is the care that must be given to the time element.

Conflagration_Planet
orangehonda wrote:
littlehotpot wrote:

what about just to play on chess.com and not teach


You don't seem to realize the difference skill makes in chess.  Fischer wouldn't be able to play chess on this site -- the same with any top player and the primary reason they're not here.

The "chess" offered on this site might as well be a fishing trip or a sandwich making contest compared to the chess they're used to playing.  This is a nice place for amateurs to hang out and shuffle some wood, but top players don't consider anything we do here real chess :)


 I even had an IM send me an email a while back telling me that very thing!

-X-
notlesu wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:

I think most chess.com members (if they are honest) love to not have to read notlesu's posts.


 theoreticalguy---I think people around here  (if they were honest) would love to hear at least one witty, funny, intelligent post from you perhaps with an itsy, bitsy, teeny, weeny knowledge of chess---Now that would be novel!


 The posts that theoreticalboy was originally criticizing, were neither witty, funny or intelligent, and contained no knowledge of chess. So I am really wondering what your point is.

-X-
notlesu wrote:
RDR75 wrote:
notlesu wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:

I think most chess.com members (if they are honest) love to not have to read notlesu's posts.


 theoreticalguy---I think people around here  (if they were honest) would love to hear at least one witty, funny, intelligent post from you perhaps with an itsy, bitsy, teeny, weeny knowledge of chess---Now that would be novel!


 The posts that theoreticalboy was originally criticizing, were neither witty, funny or intelligent, and contained no knowledge of chess. So I am really wondering what your point is.


 Where is Duncan Suttles when you need him? How come we only get the bimbos posting? There is no intelligence, no wit in any of your posts---but you are funny. Do you do stand-up? 


 I know you are but what am I?

-X-
[COMMENT DELETED]
-X-
notlesu wrote:
RDR75 wrote:
notlesu wrote:
RDR75 wrote:
notlesu wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:

I think most chess.com members (if they are honest) love to not have to read notlesu's posts.


 theoreticalguy---I think people around here  (if they were honest) would love to hear at least one witty, funny, intelligent post from you perhaps with an itsy, bitsy, teeny, weeny knowledge of chess---Now that would be novel!


 The posts that theoreticalboy was originally criticizing, were neither witty, funny or intelligent, and contained no knowledge of chess. So I am really wondering what your point is.


 Where is Duncan Suttles when you need him? How come we only get the bimbos posting? There is no intelligence, no wit in any of your posts---but you are funny. Do you do stand-up? 


 I know you are but what am I?


 Get out of town! You're Pee Wee Herman!! Bravo! I am not worthy!


 That's so funny I forgot to laugh!

-X-

Looks like our friend notlesu got out of town.

-X-
notlesu wrote:

...I dont want to waste a minute of my life talking to you. So when I see you coming---I'm leaving. ..


 Awesome. I'm here. Please leave.

kco

is 'notlesu' still here ?.... you don't drive me away RDR75 ! Tongue out

-X-

You? Never!

theoreticalboy

That was the worst age guess ever; it wasn't even a number!

dunce
notlesu wrote:

Whenever I talk to people like you---I realize why cousins shouldn't marry.


Inbreeding can indeed cause trouble talking. But that's more your parent's fault than ours.

FlowerFlowers

I think the answer is no. (I agree with the person who said he would join anonymously for practice)

and the question of would i? no, I mean I don't know what he acts like because I never met him, but the fact that he made racist comments makes me think that I wouldn't be able to tolerate his company ... unless the possibility of this meeting took place in a point in time that he didn't make those comments or be racist. then  maybe, he was kind of cute once.