Forums

A chess variant unlike the rest. One that needs great planning to win.

Sort:
Ace569er
Umang360YouTube wrote:

so this looks like you ve spent a lot of time on this variant, hmm.... where can i play this? cant you create a page or an app for playing games like this?

 

 

Yes I have a winboard program that HGMuller made me. It runs all the rules of the game. Tho you will need a high resolution screen to fit a 16x16 tile board on screen. I will find a new upload site I can add it to.
 

Ace569er
LXIVC wrote:

this looks familiar and interesting

I might be able to try it some time
the move diagrams look great!

Thank you. I put a lot of time into it. I will add an upload to a winboard program HGMuller made me to run it with all the rules/moves here soon

 

BattleChessGN18

Well, well. Look who finally returned after 2/3's a year, looking for the same tiring trouble.

Ace569er wrote:

You have no idea what you are talking about BattleChessGN18. (In fact, I do; and, you've more than proven me right time and again..) Look at you project your own thoughts and desires on to me. Grow up.

You came back after months of absence just to spew some platitudinous, threadbare, childish ad hominem diatribes (in exactly the way I predicted you would), and you tell me to grow up?

It's okay, Sweetie. I'll let you feel big for just a moment in time. ***pats head***

 

 

Ace569er wrote:

All because you wanted me to add your piece to it and I told you they do not fit.

Tell me when I ever asked you this. Remind me exactly when we ever had this exchange...

You're really good at dodging, manipulating and simply lying, aren't you?

I'll bet your comeback response is that I said it and then deleted it. Right?? tongue.png tongue.png

2200x2022

I don't know if there's some past beef between you guys where OP was belittling you and I don't like how either party has handled the progression of such regardless. 

That said. This is beautiful if only for artistic value. I'd love to see how it plays sometime if there is a publicly available way to run it. 

I don't have a 1(69 lol) iq but I am 2100 in rapid so hopefully my tiny brain can remember how the pieces move xD. 

Anyway love the project. 

BattleChessGN18

@Ace569er

Honestly, Erik. You're a 35+ year-old man. I'm a gal 10 years your junior. I "don't matter" to you. Your words. Remember? So, pat it off your shoulders. Life moves on. And, if your variant has attracted many players to you like you said it did, all the more power to you. Stop worrying about what I think, and stop looking for an argument. The worst thing you can do to make yourself look immature is to boast with bravado over a chess game that most people wouldn't mainly care about, just to insult someone's maturity when he/she calls you out on it.

Post one or a few actual recorded games on here. Show people that your game means something; not shout it.

Ace569er

You are a bit creepy and crazy lol. You also spelt my name wrong and also got my age wrong....

Ace569er

Good job on the IQ test tho. I would go to University and get tested for real if you can score that high. Still You attacked most of what i said with assumption and I pointed that out in fine detail.

Ace569er

now i guess i will read what you wrote fully, rather than skim over it. Tho I can tell you are emotional and that it typically hard to do in text. Oh and yeah I forget about this site. Been playing Ark, Elden Ring, about to hopefully start a political YouTube channel soon. Just been busy. I forget to check this site until i use my email for something and see the notices to be completely honest. Now let's see what you wrote happy.png

Ace569er

Yeah I named them different so my pieces could have names that went A-Z. I guess I could get that bugging some players. Yet that is fully subjective not objective, but yes I did change them. Mainly just for the A-Z and some I just did not like the old name, or I added a close range move etc for like the zebra and camel. I made most the long range fairy pieces also move as a close range Wazir and Ferz. While using the wazir and ferz move to seperate the types and make it all have a pattern.

Ace569er

Most the other comment where you ranting which make you look bad as well. My olny mean point was a direct rebuttal to what you said and I was rather objective and not subjective in doing it as well. The huge difference. While I also addressed everything you originally said sentance by sentence to do so. A direct proper rebuttal. You were emotional and more subjective than objective again. While I also at no point let this bother me or get emotional as you do. Sorry to trigger you, yet again you attacked me first as well mind you. I am just good at forming a rebuttal. 
So not much to comment or respond to in those ranting comments so we will just stick to the one with context.

BattleChessGN18
Ace569er wrote:

You are a bit creepy and crazy...

Oh, because I pointed out your much older age?

Sounds like someone's acting a bit on "emotions" here.

 

Ace569er wrote:

Most the other comment where you ranting which make you look bad as well... Still You attack most of what isaid with assumption and I pointed that out in fine detail...

See, why do you (still) care about something so trivial like that? Brush it off, Mr. I-Ain't-Emotionalzz-Like-You'zz.

neatgreatfire

Watching two people argue who are both kinda dumb is really funny

ninjaswat

my take on this
TLDR: too complicated for you to learn how to get good at it by studying. Meaning you have to suffer for hundreds of hours before even getting how the pieces move intuitively...

BlueHen86

What squares do the Cones of Dunshire start on?

BattleChessGN18
neatgreatfire wrote:

Watching two people argue who are both kinda dumb is really funny

Well, well. Looks like I provided some nice entertainment; for a brain-dead member who made a ***"dumb" comment to a "dumb" thread.

***(You revived this thread one month later, just to say that the members are dumb; which I don't think was all that clever, funny, or thought-provoking...)

ninjaswat wrote:

my take on this
TLDR: too complicated for you to learn how to get good at it by studying. Meaning you have to suffer for hundreds of hours before even getting how the pieces move intuitively...

The basic common language of what everyone (including me) has been trying to tell him^^^^

The-M00se

Lol wherever these two kids meet, they start trashing each other with walls of text. That's comedy right there. I really like the entire story. 

Meet irl that would be funny.

BattleChessGN18
The-M00se wrote:

Lol wherever these two kids meet, they start trashing each other with walls of text. That's comedy right there. I really like the entire story. 

Meet irl that would be funny.

Like I said, dumb threads full of dumb child's play begets dumb responses full of child's play. Notice that it only happens in Ace569er's threads, of all people on chess.com. 

That aside, I should point out that this thread was dead for nearly two weeks, before you decided (for what loosely seemed like trouble) to revive it. Surely, you had better things to do than to comment on "two kids trashing each other with walls of text"?

BattleChessGN18

Trust me, he won't be. I've known him (not personally) on chess.com variants forum for more than half a decade. I've watched him create new board configurations longer than most have. Who better than me to give that verdict.

He has a slew of old variants that are very similar to this one: an oddly-shaped large size board with pieces that don't make a whole lot of sense; and are too complicated for people to actually care to want to learn. (Though, giving credit where credit is due, the pieces in this variant are slightly simpler and easier to grasp than his previous.) All he did was reused some of these old pieces and weirdly-shaped boards and simply gave the game a new name.

And, some names he uses for his pieces are the same as preexisting pieces by other chess variants; which has the potential to cause confusion. I pointed that out to him in this thread.

None of his chess variants, which again are more or less the same game, have went on to being regularly and enjoyably played by much of anyone; certainly not on chess.com, and likely not in real person either (unless it's by a small number of close friends, associates or family members; if even that). 

The day I'm proven wrong is when this comment will be deleted.

Until then, brats can continue to disrespectfully brand me with him for being "dumb writing walls of posts attacking each other". My "dumb walls of post" have been mainly nothing more than (what I hope are) substantial criticism pieces of his chess invention processes. 

Jwang0506
Interesting
4gamingZ

How does the circles stuff work