Blunder Chess.

Nope

Isn't this the same as Losing Chess 

Losing Chess?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Losing_Chess

Actually, no. Antichess/Losing Chess is to where you must force your opponent to take all your pieces first. Blunder chess is to where you must make the worst moves possible no matter how they are.

Tip: A good way to end the game is when you and your opponent are tired of it, you can ask a draw and then end the game that way. Or just play live with 3 minutes, 5 minutes, ETC.

In your variant, I'll play very good moves and claim they're very bad moves. I see a definition problem here.

I dont notice anything wrong with what Snowy said.

whoever has the lowest accuracy wins

Snow

Or the other way, who ever has the most mistakes/missed wins will win.

I had 6 Mistakes, 15 Blunders, and 3 missed wins with Komodo1

And I lost

Well computers have no idea you're trying to lose.

And actually you won with blunder chess rules.

What would you say if Komodo1 was a real person?

Same thing unless you tell the person you're doing this. The steps are to challenge a friend who knows you are playing this variant, make it unrated, and make sure he knows the rules as well.

oh. can i play

When you play a computer you can lose a rating and win a rating

Unless it's un rated

Tell me if every people on this site had no Rating.