16883 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The top diagram is for the half-elephant and the bottom one is for the rook-in-training.
Have you any idea how you'd design these new pieces?
Most of them are taken from an old thread. I designed one of them (the half-elephant
How much are the new pieces worth?
The RT seems like a really weak piece. It can only travel to a quarter of the squares on the board.
The Long range pieces would gain value relative to short ranged pieces in this variant because the board is bigger.
The elephant and the hawk were first designed by Capablanca. The superqueen and RT are from an old thread. I made up the half-elephant though.
pawn=1 knight=3 bishop=4 rook=6 queen=11 Rook-in-Training=2.5 Half-Elephant 4.5 Hawk=8 Elephant=10 Superqueen=15
I made the long-range pieces more valuable, and for the hawk, elephant, SQ and queen it is the combined value of the pieces that it can move like +1.
To fit the RTs, the board should be coloured with 4 different colours.
The normally black squares could be coloured brown and black depending on the row number's parity, and the same goes for the white squares with, say, white and yellow. Then each RT controls a different colour.
Two questions: What is the name of this game? And two, can it be fused with chess boxing, or even chess cage fighting? Like, what about "Half Elephant Chess Cage Fighting!"
Normally (on 8x8 or 10x8) a Hawk is about equally valuable as an Elephant, and I see no reason why on 12x12 it should be different: both have the Knight component, which does not benefit from board size. (That a Queen gains more value I have no difficulty believing.) So it seems the piece values you give are a bit off. The RT also seems worth at most 1.5. K+2RT vs K is a dead draw, while K+2P vs K almost always would be a trivial win.
Note that these pieces were NOT invented by Capablanca, but about 300 years before by Pietro Carrera (who called them Centaur and Champion).
When I saw the title, I thought this would be a posting about Chu Shogi (over 600 years old!):
Note that the Japanese in general dislike Knight moves, and prefer to use compounds of King and Rook, Bishop. (The piece symbols used are not unlike something that was proposed in this forum for Chess, some time ago.)
The new game:
(Probably it would be more apt to use unicorns in stead of nightriders for the half-elephants, but at this board size XBoard did not support those. Of course it would also be possible to simply use the elephants there, and use the Capablanca names and symbols for the R+N and B+N compounds.)
How does castling work? Can a rook-in-training castle with the king?
That is a crazy interesting idea. The concept sounds really strategic. Couple of questions though; how exactly would a trainer rook check the king if it can? Also, would a trainer rook be able to capture a piece in its way if it were on the opposite color of the trainer rook?
Castling: The King moves 4 sqaures (all the squares have to be clear) with the rook on the kingside (same rank as him) or on the queensde)
i call a super queen awonms
I am going to change the RT's to king+bishop combinations. These will be called Switching Bishops (SBs)
Oops, wrong image. Here is the right image:
by BronsteinPawn a few minutes ago
Support my campaign for chess.com staff member!
by bestpony 3 minutes ago
Why didn't Fischer play Karpov
by BronsteinPawn 3 minutes ago
Opening against e4 as well d4?
by PatrickSwayC 4 minutes ago
if Fischer played in 75, could Kasparov have defeated him in 1984?
by BronsteinPawn 4 minutes ago
Fischer and the "Ka"s
Fischer vs Karpov
by BronsteinPawn 5 minutes ago
accept draw when opponent short on time?
by woton 5 minutes ago
Square Off - Anyone seen one of these in person?
by notmtwain 6 minutes ago
How long did it take you to beat the computer on level 1?
by BronsteinPawn 6 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!