Infinite chess openings


Doing my best!

it would be sad if we changed infinite set up @CaptainTugwash's idea I think. Then my work would be wasted

@Hitthepin since you invented the HTP attack... why not try 1.N(6,3) (4,4) 2.(3,4) And you'll have your own gambit!

As you'll notice, in Queen's Pawn, there is the line 1...N(6,6) What should we name this? It should be ??? game or we could remove this line altogether.

Okay, knights game- any other ideas are still welcome!
When I was developing my opening: first of all, my idea was to make flank threats on the Q's left diagonal. The queen will probably move to (-6,12) restricting the hawks movements. A common reply would be C(0,12) removing my queen from the diagonal. Then my queen would move back even farther, threatening a hawk/king fork. They would reply w/ a hawk move. Now the black C is farther away from the action. My queen has reached it's dream location, keeping the black king/troops on a line to prevent flank attacks. My queen may take a couple HPs to store in the bank. If they reply with a H move on move 1, then I grab the center with (4,4). This opening is a tactical skirmish w/ lots of waiting for boards...

This isn't really an opening, but it was an interesting play by @PixelByPixel which I underestimated. The setup started (Pixel playing White):
14.C(237,2)
then later:
20.C(237,9)
This sets up a wall behind my pieces, although I didn't take it as too dangerous because sliders can easily jump across it, or pieces like the guard can move onto it and still be protected.
But later Pixel plays:
34.Q(5,7)#
which I didn't see, and so I lost.😟

I think C(11,2) might be a good way to develop the Chancellor. But like in normal chess, it's usually not a good idea to bring out the queen or chancellor out early. It has high value, so can't be used for exchanges. Pixel's play was good, but I think it was helped by some inaccurate play by me. I captured a lot of pawns, and was thinking too much about more offensive attacks - and overlooked his ploy.