nope
most of the starting positions are super stuipd
It mainly just takes the advantage of opening book away and shows how well you play without long strings of memorized lines.
nope
theres a lot of realy stupid opening positions that give once side a big advantage
normal chess is good becaue it is balanced
fischer randoem sux
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/is-chess-960-is-useful-in-developing-standard-chess #5
That pawn structure part I am no longer sure about though. I have seen like 5% of the starting positions which is poor sampling, but that just means there are positions out there which favor different themes. My first paragraph still holds, though. The one you enjoy the more, the one you should play the more.
Is 960 good for getting better or understanding the game?