new dog tournament game McGoohan vs Rychessmaster1

Sort:
Avatar of McGoohan

16.Wb2

null

Avatar of McGoohan
rychessmaster1 hat geschrieben:

Kb7!!!!

Somehow I doubt if the move is really legal. Is the king really allowed TO GO OFFENSIVELY into a check?

Avatar of evert823
McGoohan wrote:
rychessmaster1 hat geschrieben:

Kb7!!!!

Somehow I doubt if the move is really legal. Is the king really allowed TO GO OFFENSIVELY into a check?

BxK TTxB resurrecting the King. So this is a nice example of conditional check and no issue. Legal.

Avatar of McGoohan

I've asked Evert, but no answer yet. 

The problem seems a little paradoxical to me. An example:

(White to move) Kd1≠ is legal? If yes, then follows KxKd1# 

null

 

 

Avatar of McGoohan

I just saw it now, it crossed with my posting. I accept the answer, but it should be more explicitly pointed out in the rules in future that a king can also go offensively into a check.

Avatar of McGoohan

Right. Good night, I'm sleeping over, it's late in Switzerland and I have to work very early in the morning.

Avatar of McGoohan

17.Nd3

null

Avatar of McGoohan

18.TTc2

null

Avatar of McGoohan

null18…NxQ

19.TTxN …BxTT

20.PxB

 

Avatar of McGoohan

21.Nc5+

null

Avatar of McGoohan

22.Qb3+

null

Avatar of McGoohan

23.Bb7+

null

Avatar of McGoohan

24.Pxc5

null

Avatar of McGoohan

null25.Wb4

 

Avatar of McGoohan

26.Wa6+

null

Avatar of McGoohan

27.Qb6#

null

Avatar of McGoohan

You're right.

28.Rb1+

null

Avatar of McGoohan

null29.Rb4

 

 

Avatar of McGoohan

30.PxQ

null

Avatar of McGoohan

I don't think so.

31.BxTT

null