1. Gi2-g4 f8-f6
2. Ne2-d4 Nd9-f8
3. i3-i5 g8-g6
Waterloo
Sort:
Do as I do!
Black to up.
DIAGRAM
White to down
This is easier.....? By what definition? You will be lucky to finish a game in two weeks. Might even take you over a month at that rate. Enjoy not using Winboard, I guess. I could not find any enjoyment in that. To each there own I guess. Well you should never make a blunder at least.....
Me and LXIVC should be playing quick a match today. If you want to play Saterday, I am free. You can finish a game in the time it takes to make 3 moves here. Straight multi-tasking.
Or not, I found a whole lot of players. Interested in playing me, on a chess variant forum. So I am no longer in search for more players. You ether are going to play or you are not going to. Let me know if you ever finish your game too. I'll give that a go, when I have the time.
Dec 25, 2015
0
#65
I say: if neither one of us is complaining, I don't think you need either.
If anything, the posting of diagrams is also for people to follow along in the game.
By the way, if you really are actually playing against people like you say, it would be great to see some of your games here.
Dec 25, 2015
0
#66
1.Gi2g4 1...f8f6
2.Ne2d4 2...Nd9f8
3.i3i5 3...g7g5
4.e3e4 4...
5. 5...
(Image has been scaled down to fit width of forum; to see larger size, open in new tab and, if using a PC, press ctrl+/- to zoom in and out)
Black's view (render): click here
Black's view (diagram): click here
WOW That's great!!! That's the cherished dream of my life!
And so this is Christmas
I hope you have fun
The near and the dear one
The old and the young
(John Lennon)
You can do the big business with Waterloo in the United States , Canada, France, Poland and Romania. Do not miss your chance till these ubiquitous Chinese you are not ahead .
Start with Mr. President of the U.S. Chess Center.
Aside from what I stated prior....Nope you are just having issues, while having to be corrected on things. What me to quote them? You know why I posted it dude. It was common sense. If you don't want it. That is fine. You don't need to act like an ass. Making me write out the obvious... You don't like when I do it. So don't make me do it. Just politely decline.
I would not post them 'here'. I could post them in general. Just it would be elsewhere. First I'd have to play you, in a few games. I am not going to show you all my opening set ups. So that you may learn to counter them. Before I even get to see how you will play the game. That would give you a huge unfair advantage.
On that note some of the people I play already post them. Just I'm on a different forum. They even write them out. Something I will not do. Play a few games and I'll give you a link to them. I might even copy and paste a few out of winboard myself. I am not writing them out all pretty tho.
I currently have yet to lose. 4 kings changes everything. My moves can't be forced till you take 3 kings. Which tends to cost them more than it's s worth. While planing more than 3 moves ahead almost always backfires. Just as I had hoped for. Making for quick gameplay once they figure that out. (I don't warn them) Some people love that, Some not so much. Makes for gameplay just how I wanted it though. So I love it.
Sadly LXIVC did not make it for our planned match. Hopefully he can after Xmas.
Dec 25, 2015
0
#69
lol Whatever you say, 'dude'. The things you "stated" were simply for style in rebuttal but hardly hold any actual weight. (Do you actually think I have 'serious issues', or were you saying that just to sound good for a comeback?)
It's quite 'obvious' that you don't have to post your games here. The point of fact is: you should at least feel confident to provide some form of evidence of games that are being played against LXIVC and others; if games are indeed what's happening. Also to note: people reading this "other forum", which you were more than welcome to share (by post or PM), can simply take advantage of your games in the way you say I might do so by posting your games here. What difference does it make?
1. Gi2-g4 f8-f6
2. Ne2-d4 Nd9-f8
3. i3-i5 g8-g6
4. e3-e4 e8--e6
Dec 25, 2015
0
#71
Just a quick overview of the pieces that maybe confusing (since I'll be posting these 3D renders alongside the 2D diagrams) -
Also, IvanKosintsev, I realize that you are a much stronger-rated player than I am; the difference is by 400 points! I realize that I will probably lose this match; but, for the sake of chess education, I'm going to keep on playing. ^-^
Perhaps we can use your victory as a method of promotion.
At any rate, I'm analyzing the position and thinking of my next move.
So my rebuttal loses meaning for being 'too good'. LOL. OK....I don't even understand what you were trying to say. I do not care tho. Please do not explain. Because it is not right. I asked to be polite, to help solve a problem. Which you must make an issue out of. Soley because it was me. Nothing more. It is rather easy for anyone to see by now.
As for why don't I stop them from posting.....really.......??? Because I can't stop them from posting them. I wish they didn't. Yet I also do not think they are going to use them to the manor you will. Trying to block my opening moves before I can even make them. I don't have reason to overly care if you believe me. It has no effect over if you will play or not. Just how much I care if you do. So there is no reason to lie.....I didn't know you cared, so much, how much I cared. That is sweet of you.
I do on the other hand. Have a very good reason, for not trying to give an unfair advantage. I also said LXIVC did not show, & I do hope to play later. If you care that much you can message him. If you have not done so already...Mesage me if you choose to, care to, want to play.
Dec 25, 2015
0
#73
Ace569er wrote:
I don't even understand what you were trying to say. I do not care tho. Please do not explain.
Not planning to; if you didn't get it the first time, I don't know if re-iterating myself would be all that productive.
Ace569er wrote:
So my rebuttal loses meaning for being 'too good'.
Wrong; stop trying too hard to be clever. 'Cuz you're not even in the same book, let alone on the same page.
"LOL"
BattleChessGN18 wrote:
The things you "stated" were simply for style in rebuttal but hardly hold any actual weight.
(I'm was just stating facts, you are the one 'trying' to be cleaver. Facts hold weight, even if you are not smart enough to know that. Assumtion holds none. Which is what you do, & I point out, over and over and over again.
Nothing you ever say, almost ever holds any 'weight'. Because you are not smart enough to understand even how to debate. Which blows my mind. I can list these facts I stated prior in more detail. Then you will again reply out of context and not address anything I used to prove you wrong, again. As if you do not understand how a conversation even works.
You are right tho. We do not think on the same level. You are not even close clearly.....I also don't even try. I think on this level normally. You can not out debate me. When you do try your hardest. I get a kick out of it. Because I don't even have to try, to point out all the ways you do it so poorly. I have been making this long photo mash up of all the ways I have done so on here and facebook. I will be posting them soon. Just to show you even more how you are not on my level. You have the emotional stability of a 13 year old, lol.
I use facts and verified truth to find answers, unlike you. Which is why this is so easy for me. As well as so frustrating for you. So I don't even know why you try to make issues out of nothing all the time. Just so you can try win win juast one debate verse me. Without ever using any facts or non-vague points like I do. So you simply can't even 'win' in your own mind. Because you do not seem to understand how to debate with fact instead of assumtion, guessing, and half truths. Which I point out over and over again. Which you can not do back to me. Because I do not ever use assumtion or guesses. I just spell bad, lol. I unlike you also enjoy debating. Makes me better at it. You would figure by now you would learn how to do it properly.
Like I proved to anyone who reads. I was trying to make it easier for you both to play, and it would have been a lot easier. Please ask me to list how. Even tho you know already.)
I would rather not play you anyways. You play too slowly. Plus can't think on the spot, or play without seeing one weakness to exploit them. I do not see you being that fun to play, based on those notes. Compaired to who I currently have to play. I'd give it a try, but I feel it would not be worth the effort. Plus you are too pissy and moody to play. Solely out of childish spite anyways. You most likely would even quit if you started to lose, just to see if you could upset me. Because there is no debating. That you can be that childish. When you get in your pissy whine mode. Do feel free, to use as many of my ideas. As you want in your games.
Dec 25, 2015
0
#76
Ace569er wrote:
I would rather not play you anyways. You play too slowly. Plus can't think on the spot, or play without seeing one weakness to exploit them.
Did you just make this up on the spot?
Ace569er wrote:
Plus you are too pissy and moody to play. Solely out of childish spite anyways. You most likely would even quit if you started to lose, just to see if you could upset me. Because there is no debating. That you can be that childish. When you get in your pissy whine mode.
I think you care more about my alleged "moodiness" and "childishness" (which many people, including myself, have ascribed to your own behaviour; read your own posts and evaluate your behaviour here in order to find out what we mean.) than I actually do.
Ace569er wrote:
Do feel free, to use as many of my ideas. As you want in your games.
As you have used the ideas of many variants that came before you?
Thanks for granting me that right.
BattleChessGN18 wrote:
Just a quick overview of the pieces that maybe confusing (since I'll be posting these 3D renders alongside the 2D diagrams) ...
Please publish all pieces at one picture for the comparison but by one colour contrasting with background and don't forget Spy (a promotion of Pawn). This is very important.
BattleChessGN18 wrote:
Also, IvanKosintsev, I realize that you are a much stronger-rated player than I am; the difference is by 400 points! I realize that I will probably lose this match ...
This is the classical example of the wrong approach to the chess and the absence of a good teacher. I recommend you to study https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushido
and read books Mark Twain, Bret Harte, Allan Poe and other. Never open your cards , and never be afraid of strong opponents. Play always to win even in hopeless situations .
Dec 26, 2015
0
#80
Thank you, IvanKosintsev. I appreciate the encouragement.
Insteresting read on Bushido.
I'm a little busy today, but maybe tomorrow, I will have sometime to publish all the pieces here.
I also didn't know about the spy; I seemed to have accidentally skipped it in your article. I shall come up with a design for it.
As far as the game goes....very difficult position for me. =)
Still thinking.
I only published one diagram, IK.