11. Gg4-f5 d6-d5
12. Qe4-f3 Gi9-g7
1.Gi2g4 1...f8f6
2.Ne2d4 2...Nd9f8
3.i3i5 3...g7g5
4.e3e4 4...e8e6
5.f3f5 5...Nf9g7
6.Q(Am.)f1e3 6...g6xf5
7.e4xf5 7...e6e5
8.Nd4e6 8...Nf8xe6
9.f5xe6 9...Ng7xe6
10.Q(Am.)e3e4 10...d8d6
11.Gg4f5 11...d6d5
12.Q(Am.)e4f3 12...Gi9g7
13.h3h4 13...
14. 14...
15. 15...
2D diagram: click here
Render of Black's (IvanKosintsev's) view: click here
2D diagram of Black's (IvanKosintsev's) view: click here
You can not win with the wrong notation of the party. So believe in the FIDE , and I think so . For example , Mikhail Tal was very punctual in such questions. Please correct the error.
P.S.
For the musician it is also inexcusable.
My bad, I corrected the faulty notation. (I accidentally placed my move in yours, while leaving your out.)
However, I assure you: the notation is just so that people understand the moves and is not the final determinator. Without the notation, the game is still what it is; so long as the pieces move the way they are supposed to. =)
Also, the spy piece is actually the single binoculars; designed it myself. ^-^
"Happy New Year
Happy New Year
May we all have a vision now and then
Of a world where every neighbor is a friend
Happy New Year
Happy New Year
May we all have our hopes, our will to try
If we don't we might as well lay down and die
You and I"
(ABBA - Happy New Year)
1.Gi2g4 1...f8f6
2.Ne2d4 2...Nd9f8
3.i3i5 3...g7g5
4.e3e4 4...e8e6
5.f3f5 5...Nf9g7
6.Q(Am.)f1e3 6...g6xf5
7.e4xf5 7...e6e5
8.Nd4e6 8...Nf8xe6
9.f5xe6 9...Ng7xe6
10.Q(Am.)e3e4 10...d8d6
11.Gg4f5 11...d6d5
12.Q(Am.)e4f3 12...Gi9g7
13.h3h4 13...Gk9h7
14.Nd2f1 14...
15. 15...
2D diagram: click here
Render of Black's (IvanKosintsev's) view: click here
2D diagram of Black's (IvanKsintsev's) view: click here
1.Gi2g4 1...f8f6
2.Ne2d4 2...Nd9f8
3.i3i5 3...g7g5
4.e3e4 4...e8e6
5.f3f5 5...Nf9g7
6.Q(Am.)f1e3 6...g6xf5
7.e4xf5 7...e6e5
8.Nd4e6 8...Nf8xe6
9.f5xe6 9...Ng7xe6
10.Q(Am.)e3e4 10...d8d6
11.Gg4f5 11...d6d5
12.Q(Am.)e4f3 12...Gi9g7
13.h3h4 13...Gk9h7
14.Nd2f1 14...Gb9d7
15.Gf5xd7 15...
2D diagram: click here
Render of Black's view: click here
2D diagram of black's view: click here
1.Gi2g4 1...f8f6
2.Ne2d4 2...Nd9f8
3.i3i5 3...g7g5
4.e3e4 4...e8e6
5.f3f5 5...Nf9g7
6.Q(Am.)f1e3 6...g6xf5
7.e4xf5 7...e6e5
8.Nd4e6 8...Nf8xe6
9.f5xe6 9...Ng7xe6
10.Q(Am.)e3e4 10...d8d6
11.Gg4f5 11...d6d5
12.Q(Am.)e4f3 12...Gi9g7
13.h3h4 13...Gk9h7
14.Nd2f1 14...Gb9d7
15.Gf5xd7 15...Ne9xd6
16.Q(Am.)f3xd5 16...
17. 17...
18. 18...
19. 19...
20. 20...
2D diagram: click here
Render of Black's move: click here
2D diagram of Black's move: click here
ChastityMoon wrote:
This is cockamamie, why don't you play dungeons and dragons instead.
My answer:
It's the interesting 3D chess but isn't the acme of perfection. Personally, I play only Ideals!
Ah, but "perfection" is a fruit that doesn't exist. If at least 3 other people are intrigued by your variant and see great potential in it(and at least 1 wants to play his first trial game with you), I think it is heading in the right direction.
Anyways, I knew you were going to make that move.
1.Gi2g4 1...f8f6
2.Ne2d4 2...Nd9f8
3.i3i5 3...g7g5
4.e3e4 4...e8e6
5.f3f5 5...Nf9g7
6.Q(Am.)f1e3 6...g6xf5
7.e4xf5 7...e6e5
8.Nd4e6 8...Nf8xe6
9.f5xe6 9...Ng7xe6
10.Q(Am.)e3e4 10...d8d6
11.Gg4f5 11...d6d5
12.Q(Am.)e4f3 12...Gi9g7
13.h3h4 13...Gk9h7
14.Nd2f1 14...Gb9d7
15.Gf5xd7 15...Ne9xd6
16.Q(Am.)f3xd5 16...Ne6d4
17.Q(Am.)d5a5+ 17...
18. 18...
19. 19...
20. 20...
2D diagram: click here
Rend of Black's view: click here
2D diagram of Black's view: click here
Check
1.Gi2g4 1...f8f6
2.Ne2d4 2...Nd9f8
3.i3i5 3...g7g5
4.e3e4 4...e8e6
5.f3f5 5...Nf9g7
6.Q(Am.)f1e3 6...g6xf5
7.e4xf5 7...e6e5
8.Nd4e6 8...Nf8xe6
9.f5xe6 9...Ng7xe6
10.Q(Am.)e3e4 10...d8d6
11.Gg4f5 11...d6d5
12.Q(Am.)e4f3 12...
13. 13...
14. 14...
15. 15...
2D diagram: click here
Render of Black's (IvanKosintsev's) view: click here
2D diagram of Black's (IvanKosintsev's) view: click here