Why is 960 treated as second fiddle?

Sort:
Avatar of Entangle71

I wish 960 tournaments included time incremented games, like 15 | 10 or at least 5 | 5.    At present I only see 3 | 0 and 10 | 0 games.  

No stats on chess.com for 960 games as well meh.png

Your thoughts?

Avatar of notmtwain
Entangle71 wrote:

 

I wish 960 tournaments included time incremented games, like 15 | 10 or at least 5 | 5.    At present I only see 3 | 0 and 10 | 0 games.  

No stats on chess.com for 960 games as well 

Your thoughts?

Because the number of tournaments probably reflects demand more than anything else.

You should be happy that CEO Erik likes it.

https://www.chess.com/blog/erik/bumpy-chess960-flight-with-a-stressful-endgame-landing

 

Avatar of Entangle71

Finally 960 is no longer treated as second fiddle