Most on here don't have an identity to steal.
Blocking Members Manifesto
Sort:
Stevie65 wrote:
Most on here don't have an identity to steal.
And some of the ID's that are here...no one would want.
I should hope not! That would be just wierd! If only people were proud to be! Notions like that simply wouldn't exist.
Genghiskhant wrote:
For the record, I don't think anyone here said they were in favour of actual identity theft and credit card fraud. 'The voice of reason' lol. What a tard
Of course not Genghiskhant. The voice of reason (generally speaking) will cause a person with a sense of honor to act when action must be taken; the purpose being to prevent fools from committing atrocities. That's my subjective perspective anyway. And I sense you have a sense of honor, for what it's worth. Only you can decide what action you will take.
Go Genghis!
learningthemoves wrote:
Spartanemesis, your heart seems to be in the right place. (Defending those who are attacked, bullied, abused, have their identities stolen and credit card info sold to 3rd parties for advertising purposes.)
For the record (after seeing my post pasted, it wasn't clear) but this is what I am referring to as retarded.
He has taken a post about trolling and name changing on a chess website to a place where anyone who disagrees with you is in favour of abuse, identity theft and selling credit card information.
Either that, or insinuating that your vendetta on trolls actually covers these things.
Which ever way you cut it, I would advise that, if you are to be taken seriously, you don't have this guy join your campaign. It's like McCain and Palin....He probably had some good ideas but, as soon as he took that mental case on board, his credibility was shot.
Of course, I could be completely wrong here. Maybe you are comparing trolling to identity theft and the sale of other people's credit card information. In which case, you would likely deserve one another. Pretty sure that's not the case though.
Apr 2, 2013
0
#308
Genghiskhant wrote:
learningthemoves wrote:
Spartanemesis, your heart seems to be in the right place. (Defending those who are attacked, bullied, abused, have their identities stolen and credit card info sold to 3rd parties for advertising purposes.)
For the record (after seeing my post pasted, it wasn't clear) but this is what I am referring to as retarded.
He has taken a post about trolling and name changing on a chess website to a place where anyone who disagrees with you is in favour of abuse, identity theft and selling credit card information.
Either that, or insinuating that your vendetta on trolls actually covers these things.
Which ever way you cut it, I would advise that, if you are to be taken seriously, you don't have this guy join your campaign. It's like McCain and Palin....He probably had some good ideas but, as soon as he took that mental case on board, his credibility was shot.
Of course, I could be completely wrong here. Maybe you are comparing trolling to identity theft and the sale of other people's credit card information. In which case, you would likely deserve one another. Pretty sure that's not the case though.
That's the oldest trick in the book of darkness GenghisKunt.
Divide and conquer. You see the forces of good uniting with a common goal and the strength of unity creates a threat to the evil using the darkness to cover your misdeeds.
But the good thing about it is we know those who stand for what is just don't need to curse or stab out at the darkness.
Instead, we simply turn on the light and darkness flees like sewer rats scurrying and running for cover under whatever sewer lid they crawled up out from in the first place.
Of course those who are the purveyors of darkness will call good evil and evil good.
So it only stands to reason, when the good fellow called me the voice of reason you had to rush to compare me with who you say is a "mental case".
If it's true my mind is on trial, then let the record reflect it's not guilty by reason of sanity.
Oh how we could wish the record reflected the same verdict for your state of mind, couldn't we?
But that isn't the case at all is it...your "honor"?
So trolling is the same as identity theft and selling people's credit card details?
learningthemoves wrote:
Genghiskhant wrote:
learningthemoves wrote:
Spartanemesis, your heart seems to be in the right place. (Defending those who are attacked, bullied, abused, have their identities stolen and credit card info sold to 3rd parties for advertising purposes.)
For the record (after seeing my post pasted, it wasn't clear) but this is what I am referring to as retarded.
He has taken a post about trolling and name changing on a chess website to a place where anyone who disagrees with you is in favour of abuse, identity theft and selling credit card information.
Either that, or insinuating that your vendetta on trolls actually covers these things.
Which ever way you cut it, I would advise that, if you are to be taken seriously, you don't have this guy join your campaign. It's like McCain and Palin....He probably had some good ideas but, as soon as he took that mental case on board, his credibility was shot.
Of course, I could be completely wrong here. Maybe you are comparing trolling to identity theft and the sale of other people's credit card information. In which case, you would likely deserve one another. Pretty sure that's not the case though.
That's the oldest trick in the book of darkness GenghisKunt.
Divide and conquer. You see the forces of good uniting with a common goal and the strength of unity creates a threat to the evil using the darkness to cover your misdeeds.
But the good thing about it is we know those who stand for what is just don't need to curse or stab out at the darkness.
Instead, we simply turn on the light and darkness flees like sewer rats scurrying and running for cover under whatever sewer lid they crawled up out from in the first place.
Of course those who are the purveyors of darkness will call good evil and evil good.
So it only stands to reason, when the good fellow called me the voice of reason you had to rush to compare me with who you say is a "mental case".
If it's true my mind is on trial, then let the record reflect it's not guilty by reason of sanity.
Oh how we could wish the record reflected the same verdict for your state of mind, couldn't we?
But that isn't the case at all is it...your "honor"?
Who'da' thunk W plays chess. Kill them evil-doers! The lot of 'em!
Gosh, I thought this thread was about a blocking more than 200 people.
Now I find out its about light vs. darkness!
Sign me up!
.......
Down with light! All hail the Prince of Darkness!
Fun fact: you never see Spartanemesis and learningthemoves posting at exactly the same time.
Coincidence? Or perhaps...they are the same person...?
Just a thought. A random one. Surely, thats not actually true!
Can't be. Now you've offended the Athenian.
To be fair, there is an obvious intelligence gap between the two.
Ubik brings the term "act of God" into perspective.
Genghiskhant wrote:
To be fair, there is an obvious intelligence gap between the two.
you do realize he's cherry picking sentences from "scott pakins complaint letter generator" don't you?
bigpoison wrote: Can't be. Now you've offended the Athenian.
bigpoison the name suits you well. Are you implying I am Athenian? I think I know where you're going with that. A part of me almost wants you to succeed. I won't make it easy though. As it would be pointless to ask you a few questions I won't waste my time.
ubik42 wrote:
Fun fact: you never see Spartanemesis and Learningthemoves posting at exactly the same time.... perhaps...they are the same person...
ubik42 your logic (if I can call it that) is severely flawed. The comment I wrote which begins: "Aha! The voice of reason," was posted within minutes of the comment prior to that. I happened to be online at the same time as Learningthemoves.
Did I mention you really remind me of someone I used to be friends with? You actually remind me of two people I used to be friends with. If I knew you in the real world and you ever had the audacity to say some of the crap that I have the impression is one of your trademarks, there is no telling how big a fool I would make of you. One of the old friends you remind me of I consider to be one of the biggest con-artists I ever had the misfortune of knowing. (Fun fact: he's fond of the number 666, not that it's really relevant.) I hate con-artists. ubik42 I'd really like it if you stayed out of this discussion from here on out, but please don't let that stop you.
Pray & be thankful before every game from now on you lot.
For the record, I don't think anyone here said they were in favour of actual identity theft and credit card fraud. 'The voice of reason' lol. What a tard