Chess.com has changed the world

Sort:
Avatar of mf410827

Before chess.com there was just chess here and there, mostly old people used to play. After queen's gambit and chess.com.. the world has changed. some streamers also contributed, levy (like him or not) hikaru chesbrahs.. even rossen, they all did their parts.

Now youngsters play chess, chess is not a bald head old guy's sport anymore.. Bullet timecontrol also helped the transition (even though i don't approve it, it still helped to make chess more popular)

But chess.com has a special role, erik and jay maybe didn't dream this much of success, what they did, just grew big.. huge. and become almost chess itself. there is this lichess too but in making-organizations-wise  chess . com led the community, formed the community.. became the community. with all those live streams and many GMs are working on them as commentators (danny is already a gameshow host in his core..)

We got to know all elites just by their shows, without chess . com there would only have been old fide tournaments, all official and all serious.. here we are having fun.. and this is something.

Avatar of mf410827
DanDuryea wrote:

Crawler.🤮

crawling implies obtaining benefit, I'm already a premium member, what else chess.com can give me? other than a thing i already have?

that's whats wrong with people these days, you never keep yourself from making negative criticism but you always stay quite when you actually need to speak.

I expressed my thoughts, and said what i think is right.

Avatar of BIGSHADOWWARRIOR

lichess is better

Avatar of darlihysa

Hikaru Debora and La grave had made chess.com what it is!!!

Avatar of Wits-end

"We are the world..."

Avatar of magipi

Chess.com was founded in 2005. Internet chess was already present for at least 10 years at that point.

Also, amateur chess players (young and old) were playing blitz all around the world many decades before that.

The opening post is both nonsensical and creepy. Good job!

Avatar of Woollensck3
People who say Iichess is better, I would like them to explain why ! 🤷‍♂️
Avatar of BIGSHADOWWARRIOR
Woollensck3 wrote:
People who say Iichess is better, I would like them to explain why ! 🤷‍♂️

takebacks
moving pieces easier
free full game analysis

Avatar of Woollensck3
Wdym take backs ! 🙀
Avatar of mf410827
bobby_max wrote:

OP seems to have issues with older people. Perhaps ageism.

You are scrutinizing the details, there is a significant point there which seems like many people are simply missing it..

It's not chess.com or lichess, it's not which is better, it's not crawling and it's not creepy..

Imagine for a second, if chess.com just disappeared, removed or closed. How would it affect the chess world, I just watched wesley vs. magnus stream yesterday.. danny was the host.. again, it was all live and fun, with hess commentating and some other masters. Remember another stream, another tournament, another organization.. who hosted it? Who made it possible and brought to us? now Imagine all those are just gone..

it's not wrong to show appreciation for the things you have, but seems like only negativism are commonly accepted, people feel like there is something wrong here.

Avatar of BIGSHADOWWARRIOR

it'd probably make things better because people would use lichess instead

Avatar of BlueScreenRevenge
Woollensck3 wrote:
People who say Iichess is better, I would like them to explain why ! 🤷‍♂️
  1. Way less buggy than chess.com
  2. FOSS

There are certain things that chess.com does better, but nothing can outweigh the above two points. At least for me.

Avatar of ChessDude009
BlueScreenRevenge wrote:
Woollensck3 wrote:
People who say Iichess is better, I would like them to explain why ! 🤷‍♂️
  1. Way less buggy than chess.com
  2. FOSS

There are certain things that chess.com does better, but nothing can outweigh the above two points. At least for me.

I would like to add on-chess.com is better for paying members, while lichess is better for free ones.

Avatar of MarMar365

it kinda did to think of it